JYOTSNA RANI BARMAN v. MD. NAZIMUDDIN AHMED
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-10. JYOTSNA RANI BARMAN v. MD. NAZIMUDDIN AHMED. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010123682019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/1977/2019 JYOTSNA RANI BARMAN W/O DHURBA KUMAR TALUKDAR, INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL BARPETA DIST. CIRCLE, BARPETA, ASSAM, PRESENTLY STAYING AT CHANDANPUR , WARD NO. 8, P. O. AND P. S. BARPETA ROAD, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781315 VERSUS MD. NAZIMUDDIN AHMED S/O MD. JAMIRUDDIN, R/O VILL. DHEKENABARI, P. O. AND P. S. CHAYGAON, DIST. KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, PIN 781124 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPTT. OF EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 19 4:SCHOOL SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR THE POST OF PRINCIPAL OF DR. ZAKIR HUSSAIN H. S. SCHOOL ALOPATI P. O. ALOPATI AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN 78112 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD Page No. # 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR.
JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA O R D E R 10. 12. 2020 Heard Mr. MU Mahmud, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. SMT Chisti, learned standing counsel for Secondary Education Department of the Government of Assam. None appears for the opposite party No. 4 School Selection Committee for the post of Principal of Dr Jakir Hussain School, Alopati of Barpeta district. The petitioner who is the Inspector Schools, Barpeta, although in the meantime been transferred out to some other place, has instituted this application with a prayer for extension of time to deposit the cost of Rs. 25,000/- imposed by the order dated 08. 03. 2019 in WP(C) No. 639/2018. It is stated that against the order dated 08. 03. 2019, an appeal has been preferred before the Division Bench, but the same is yet to be given its consideration. In the circumstance, Mr. MU Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a prayer that the time for depositing the cost of Rs. 25,000/- be extended by three months.
We accept the prayer and accordingly provide that the requirement of depositing the cost of Rs. 25,000/- pursuant to order dated 08. 03. 2019 in WP(C) No. 639/2018 stands extended for three months from today. Interlocutory application stands allowed in the above terms. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.