THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. v. No.G/5010542M RFN/GD SRI. PRAMOD KUMAR PATRA
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-07-18. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. v. No.G/5010542M RFN/GD SRI. PRAMOD KUMAR PATRA. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Serial No. 02 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC (WPC) No. 128 of 2024 in WP(C) No. 464 of 2022 Date of Decision: 18. 07. 2024 1. The Union of India Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi-110001. 2. Mahanideshalaya Assam Rifles, Directorate General, Assam Rifles, Shillong-793010, Meghalaya 3. The Directorate General, Assam Rifles, Record Branch (ADMN-IV) Shillong-793011, Meghalaya … Applicant(s)/Respondents - Versus - No. G/5010542M Rfn/GD, Sri. Pramod Kumar Patra, S/o Sri. Kartick Patra, 20 Assam Rifles, PIN No. 932020, C/o 99 APO and Permanent resident of Kasimpur, Village, Odisha …. Opp. Party/Petitioner(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. A. Pradhan, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Dr. P. Agarwal, Adv. _________________________________________________________ i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.
: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No (ORAL) 1. This is an application for extension of time for compliance of the Judgment and Order dated 22. 03. 2024, passed in WP(C) No. 464 of 2022. 2. Dr. N. Mozika, learned DSGI assisted by Ms. A. Pradhan, learned counsel for the applicants/respondents submits that the age of the petitioner has since been relaxed as per the directions contained in the order dated 22. 03. 2024, and what remains is only for final reconsideration with regard to the petitioner’s remusteration. He further submits that as the process is still taking some time, he prays that he may be allowed 4(four) months’ further time to complete the same. 3. Dr. P. Agarwal, learned counsel for opposite party/writ petitioner has vehemently opposed to the prayer of the respondents, and submits that enough time has been allowed, and that respondents have come belatedly with the application. 4.
Considering the submissions and notwithstanding the objections of the opposite party/writ petitioner, the respondents are granted 2(two) months’ further time from today, to complete the entire exercise. 5. With the above directions, this matter stands closed and is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Meghalaya 18. 07. 2024 “V. Lyndem-PS” Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2024. 07. 18 18:11:32 IST Powered by TCPDF (www. tcpdf. org)
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.