SAIJU SEBASTIAN v. LINI S
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2025-04-10. SAIJU SEBASTIAN v. LINI S. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
OP(FC). No. 231 of 2025 2025:KER:31539 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. B. SNEHALATHA TH THURSDAY, THE 10 DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 OP (FC) NO. 231 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN OP NO. 374 OF 2018 OF FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA PETITIONER/PETITIONER: SAIJU SEBASTIAN AGED 46 YEARS S/O SEBASTIAN, BABU NIVAS , PADINJAREVEETIL, TR CROSS ROAD, THOPPUMPADY ,KOCHI , ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682005 BY ADVS. P. MOHAMED SABAH SAIPOOJA BENSON AMBROSE RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: LINI S AGED 39 YEARS D/O. NIRMALA, LINI BHAVAN, RAJAGIRI, SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE, KUNNATHUR TALUK, KOLLAM, PIN - 690521 THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10. 04. 2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(FC). No. 231 of 2025 2025:KER:31539 DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & M. B. SNEHALATHA, JJ. ================================ OP(FC). No.
231 of 2025 ================================ th Dated this the 10 day of April, 2025 JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J. The petitioner singularly pleads that Ext. P1 application preferred by him be directed to be disposed of by the learned Family Court, Chavara, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. We notice from Ext. P1 that what the petitioner has sought is that he be given interim custody of his child from April to May, 2025. 3. Sri. Mohamed Sabah – learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that, even though the major share of the time frame mentioned in Ext. P1 has already elapsed, her client still wants the said application to be considered because, he will be in India only till May. 4. Taking note of the afore submissions and since the application in question seeks interim custody of the child for a specified period, we are certain that the learned Family Court should consider it without delay, as per law. OP(FC). No.
231 of 2025 2025:KER:31539 In the afore circumstances, clarifying that our directions herein will not be construed as a precedent, but issued only in the peculiar circumstances noticed, we direct the learned Family Court, Chavara, to take up Ext. P1 application – if it is still pending – and dispose of the same, after affording necessary opportunity to both sides, as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than one week from today. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE Sd/- M. B. SNEHALATHA, JUDGE Mms 2025:KER:31539 APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 231/2025 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS THE COPY OF THE SAID I. A. 19 /2025 IN OP (G & W) 374 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA THE TRUE COPY OF THE CAUSE LIST DATED 04. 04. 2025 OF THE FAMILY COURT CHAVARA IN THE CAMP SITTING AT SANSTHAMCOTTA FAMILY COURT THE TRUE COPY OF THE PORTION OF THE A- DIARY PROCEEDINGS ON THE DATE OF 04. 04. 2025 OF GOP NO. 374/2018 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ADVANCE PETITION DATED 07. 04. 2025 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12. 12.
2024 PASSED IN CRL. M. P NO. 594/2018 IN M. C NO. 265/2018 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF THE MAINTENANCE AMOUNT THE MONTH OF APRIL 2025 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT ISSUED BY EINT AUTOMOTIVE LLC APPROVING LEAVE FROM 06. 04. 2025 TO 06/05/ 2025
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.