BHUPINDER SINGH @ BHINDA v. STATE OF PUNJAB
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-09-25. BHUPINDER SINGH @ BHINDA v. STATE OF PUNJAB. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
223. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHCHANDIGARH CRMCRM-11714-2025 IN CRACRA-S-1632-2024 (O&M) Date of decision:Date of decision: 25. 09. 2025 Bhupinder Singh @ BhindaBhupinder Singh @ Bhinda .... Appellant Versus State of PunjabState of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMARNAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocate, forMr. Raman Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. Rajeev K. Kapila, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Rajeev K. Kapila, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, PunjabPunjab. ----- NAMIT KUMARNAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in application i. e. CRM--11714-2025 filed under Section filed under Section 389 Cr. P. C. is for suspension of sentence of the applicant389 Cr. P. C. is for suspension of sentence of the applicant389 Cr. P. C.
is for suspension of sentence of the applicant-appellant duringappellant during the pendency of appeal, which stood admitted on 24. 04. 2024. the pendency of appeal, which stood admitted on 24. 04. 2024. the pendency of appeal, which stood admitted on 24. 04. 2024. 2. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of theAt this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of theAt this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant-appellant submits that during the pendency of present appeal, theappellant submits that during the pendency of present appeal, theappellant submits that during the pendency of present appeal, theappellant submits that during the pendency of present appeal, the applicant-appellant has unfortunately died on 15. 06. 2025. appellant has unfortunately died on 15. 06. 2025. appellant has unfortunately died on 15. 06. 2025. 3.
LearnedLearnedLearned State counsel, on State counsel, on State counsel, on instructions from Rajiv instructions from Rajiv instructions from Rajiv Kumar Kumar Kumar Arora, Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Amritsar, has also affirmed the saidArora, Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Amritsar, has also affirmed the saidArora, Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Amritsar, has also affirmed the saidArora, Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Amritsar, has also affirmed the said fact. 4. In this view of the matter, the present appeal, which wasIn this view of the matter, the present appeal, which wasIn this view of the matter, the present appeal, which was admitted on 24. 04. 2024, is taken on board today itself and consequently,admitted on 24. 04. 2024, is taken on board today itself and consequently,admitted on 24. 04. 2024, is taken on board today itself and consequently,admitted on 24. 04. 2024, is taken on board today itself and consequently, the application and the appeal i. e.
the application and the appeal i. e. CRA-S-16321632-2024 challenging judgment CRA-S-1632-2024 (O&M) - 2 -dated 01. 03. 2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track, Special Court, Amritsar, convicting him rigorous imprisonment for five years, in case FIR No. 47, dated 12. 03. 2023, under Sections 354, 354-A of IPC, Section 10 of POCSO Act, Police Station Chheharta, Amritsar, are disposed of as abated. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE September 25, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.