M/S BAJRANG LOGISTIX PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 6 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-03-18. M/S BAJRANG LOGISTIX PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 6 ORS. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Serial No. 02 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 560 of 2025 Date of Decision :18. 03. 2026 M/s Bajrang Logistix Private Limited Represented by its authorized signatory i. e. Mr. Ayush Dhanania, Director having its registered office th At 22, Hemanta Basu Sarani, 6 Floor, Unit-6F, Kolkata, West Bengal-700001. …Petitioner(s) -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya represented by The Chief Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Housing Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 3. The Director, Directorate of Housing, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong-793001. 4. M/s Power Roofing, Umtru Road Village Amjok, Byrnihat, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya-793122 5. M/s Meghalaya Roofing, Industrial Area, Umiam, Meghalaya-793103. 6. Manaksia Aluminium Company Limited, 8/1, Lal Bazar Street, Bikaner Building, Third Floor, Kolkata, West Bengal-700001. 7.
M/s Mariem Commerce Limited, Umbir, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya-793101. …Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge. Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. Ch. Gautam, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. D. Chullai, AAG with Ms. Z. E Nongkynrih, GA (For R 1-3) Dr. N. Mozika, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M. L. Nongpiur, Adv. (For R 4) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner by the instant writ petition has sought for directions to allow it to participate in the tender process based on the directions contained in an order dated 28. 08. 2025 passed in WA No. 44/2025 and other connected matters with regard to supply or roofing sheets. The writ petitioner however was not a tenderer in the tender process for which NIT had been floated on 10. 09. 2024. 2.
A perusal of the said directions contained in the order referred to above would reflect that the learned Division Bench had only limited the test of eligibility to one Manaksia Aluminum company and M/s Mariem Commerce Limited who were tenderers in the initial round. The writ petitioner being a stranger to the proceedings, therefore has no locus to seek participation in the process which was already underway and subject to orders of the Court. Accordingly, there being no ground to sustain the writ petition, the same is dismissed. JUDGE Meghalaya 18. 03. 2026 “V. Lyndem- PS” Signature Not Verified Page 3 of 3 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026. 03. 20 18:27:56 IST
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.