LAMBU @ CHANDRA MOHAN JHA @ CHANDRAMANI JHA v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2026-04-09. LAMBU @ CHANDRA MOHAN JHA @ CHANDRAMANI JHA v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 444 of 2026 Lambu @ Chandra Mohan Jha @ … Petitioner Chandramani Jha Mrs. R. L. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. S. C. Pradhan, Addl. PP Mr. M. Mohanty, Advocate (Informant) CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER(ORAL) 09. 04. 2026 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S. 483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Bamapada (Industrial Area) PS Case No. 87 of 2024 corresponding to ST Case No. 198 of 2025 pending in the file of learned Sessions Judge, Balasore for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 302/120(B)/34 of IPC r/w Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, on the main allegation of entering into conspiracy with co-accused persons to eliminate the deceased Sk. Jasmin by firing at him. 3. Heard, Mrs. Rebati Lata Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner; Mr. Maitrajit Mohanty, learned counsel for the informant and Mr.
S. C. Pradhan, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record. 4. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, there appears allegation against the Petitioner for entering into conspiracy with co-accused persons to eliminate the deceased and in consequence of such conspiracy, it is alleged that the deceased was done to death. Besides, the conviction of the Petitioner for commission of offences U/S. 396 could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. In such view of the matter and taking into account the nature and gravity of the offence as alleged against the petitioner vis-a-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the materials placed on record and last but not the least, taking into account the conviction of the Petitioner in another case for committing murder with dacoity, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands rejected.
Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the learned trial Court. (G. Satapathy) Judge Priyajit
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.