Modali Venkata Suryanarayana v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-02-22. Modali Venkata Suryanarayana v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 31661 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO:4507 OF 2024 Between: Modali Venkata Suryanarayana, S/o. Late Modali Krishna Murthy Sarma, Aged 66 years, Occ. Advocate, R/o Flat No. 101 and 102, Surya Residency,H. No. 1-2-288141, Domalguda, Hyderabad - 500 029. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Principal Secretary, Govt. of Telangana, I\,4unrcipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 Greatei Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep- by its Commissioner' Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad- 4 Deputy Comniissioner, Greater Hyderabad tt4unicipal Corporation Circle No. 20, Serlingampally, ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constrtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking up the revision/stay petition filed by the Petitioner on 14-O2-2O24 against the Speaking Order dt. 27-01-2024 in No. 1559/Cir. 20/SLP/GHt\/Cl2O23 issued by the 4th respondent, for hearing as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to dispose of revision/stay petition filed by the Petitioner exPeditiouslY lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Speaking Order No. 1559/cir.
20/sLP/GHMC/2023 issued by the 4th respondent tiil the 2nd respondent dispose of the Revision/Stay petition filed by the petitioner against the said Speaking Order Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MAHADEV ANYARAMBHATLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: Gp FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3&4: SRI M. A. K. MUKHEED, SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W. P-No. 45O7 of 2024 ORDER: After making initial submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through Hybrid Mode seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum and avail remedies open to him in law. 2. Sri M. A. K. Mukheed, learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 3 and 4, has no objection for the aforesaid course of action being adopted by ttre petitioner. 3.
Granting liberty as sought for, the Writ Petition is ciismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs 1. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall n stand closed. SD/. K. SREERAMA MURTHY s ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// t) SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADIVIINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPM_ENT ,. l_fig. l Cqurt for the State of Tetangana. at Hyderabad [OUTI ^ 2. One CC to SRI. MAHADEV ANYARAIVBHATLA ,Advocare tOpUCl 3. One CC to SRl. M. A. K. MUKHEED, STANDTNG COUNSEL [OpUCl 4. Two CD Copies BM GJP \ \"- HIGH COURT l DATED:2210212024 tlE f4 I 6 e $ J ( c . J 1 0 API 2024 z a I t 9cSPATCH eo ORDER WP. No. 4507 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \ @
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.