ISAK MAKNOJIA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND ORS
Court: Bombay High Court
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2026-08-20. ISAK MAKNOJIA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Gitalaxmi 904-WP-10450-2026. docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10450 OF 2026 ISAK MAKNOJIA ... PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS Mr. Uzair Kazi a/w Mr. Rohit Vaishya i/b YMK Legal, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. Santosh Mali a/w Mr. Digambar Kawale, Advocates for Respondent No. 2-BMC. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the State-Respondent No. 1. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. th DATE : 20 AUGUST, 2026. Per Court : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Learned AGP for the State-Respondent No. 1 has placed on th record a communication dated 19 August, 2026, indicating that the th Gitalaxmi 904-WP-10450-2026. docx Appeal filed by the Petitioner before the learned Minister, is kept for nd hearing on 2 September, 2026 at 3:30 p. m. 3.
Learned counsel for the Bombay Municipal Corporation submits that this Court by earlier order has protected the Petitioner for a period of 6 weeks to approach the Minister and the same was th also continued by the subsequent order dated 13 February, 2026. However, the matter is not so far heard by the Minister. 4. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the order passed by th this Court dated 13 February, 2026 is extended till the learned Minister passes interim order or a final order without interim order in the matter, whichever is earlier. 5. The interim protection will cease to exist once the learned Minister passes any interim order or final order without interim order, in the matter and the order of the learned Minister would thereafter take effect. 6. This order is passed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and the pending Appeal to be decided on its own merits. 7. In view of the above, Writ Petition No. 10450 of 2026 stands disposed of accordingly.
[ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] th Digitally signed by GITALAXMI GITALAXMI KRISHNA KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2026. 08. 24 19:32:45 +0530
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.