T.BAL REDDY (died) per LRs v. THE JOINT COLLECTOR
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-02-21. T.BAL REDDY (died) per LRs v. THE JOINT COLLECTOR. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 3303 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NOS: 15426 OF 1 991 AND 18996 0F 1995 W. P. No. 15426 of 1991 Between: T. Bal Reddy ..... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner, Survey Settlement and Land Records, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to the notice No. D1/7958/89, dated 20- 05-1995 from the office of the respondent herein and may be pleased to quash the same by issuing writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari declaring the same as illegal, void and contrary to the principles of natural justice and without jurisdiction and to issue any other writ or direction. |. A.
NO:1 OF 1991 (WPMP. N O:19684 OF 1991) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass order suspending the operation of order No. Bl16034/85 by the respondent No. 2 herein pending w. p. no. 15426 of 1991. Counsel for the Petitioner : SMT PRASUNA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI A. PULLA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE I I W. P. NO:18996 OF Between: 1 T. BAL REDDY (died) oer. r_ll T. VENK|AH AGRICULTURE _SlO ALTAS VENKAT REDDY Ryo UPPAI nerleahebbVijiGin,cr 2 C"Jov i"il"n# ;i". uppar, hi3'I,ffityJLiilili", Uppar Mandar, 3. Reddy Business R/o. Uppar, k[S,lEEI. JVB,tr,f;terBar Uppar Mandar, 4. Bar Reddy Business Rr/o. Uppar, Uppar hffifHrTirbff_l3,; Mandar, 5. Bar Reddy Business R/o. Uppar, Uppar kt_[T$fft. Jijlft,i1" Mandar, 6. Reddy Business Rr/o Uppar, IiiS[ [83. Ji,313rf,,3f"' Uppar Mandar, (Petitioners 2 to 6 brought on record as LRs of deceased) .....
PETITtONERS AND The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District Khairtabad, Hyderabad. ..... RESPONDENT Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to notice no -d 1 /7958/89 dt-20-5-95 from the office of the respondent here in and may be pleased to quash the sbme by rssurng a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of certiorari declaring the same is as illegal, void. Contrary to the principles of the natural justice and equity and witho ut jurisdiction and to issue t. A. NO: 10F 199 WP MP. NO 232550F1 995 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the notice no. d1t79SB/89, dt:20_5-95 issued by the respondent herein pending final disposal of the writ petition. l. A. NO oF 2007 P.
NO:2 0435 F 2007 Petition under section 15'1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to bring the Legal representatives of the deceased petitioner on record AS petitioners No. 2 to 6 in the Wp No. 18996/1g95. Counsel for the petitioners : SMT PRASUNA REDDy, ADVOCATE FOR SRI A. PULLA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the foilowing COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENfVAS RAO Writ Pe titio n Nos. t5426 of 1991 an d 189 96o f 1995 ORDER When the matters are taken up for consideration, Smt. Prasuna Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri A. Pulla Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in spite of their best efforts they could not secure any instructions from the petitioner to proceed with the matters on merits and expressed their inability. . ) These writ petitions are of the years 1991 and 1995.
3 Registry has submitted a note to the effect that the case file/records are not traceable. 4. Considering the above and the long pendency, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter in a state of pendency. However, riberty is granted to the parties to either fire a fresh writ petition or seek revival in the event case file is traced out or in the event any prejudicial action is taken. I 5. Accordingly, writ petitions are disposed of without prejudice to the rights of the parties subsisting as oll date. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, if any, pcnding shall stand closed. SD/. A. V. S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI6fu OFFICER To and Land Records, Hyderabad' 1. The Commissioner, Survey Settlement Khairtabad, HyderqPad' i. fh" Joint Collector, nangi Reddy District the State of Telangana at 5. fWo CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE, High Court for Hyderabad. [OUT] 4. One CC to Sri A.
Pulla Reddy, Advocate [OPUCI 5. Twb CD CoPies SA IW l HIGH COURT DATED:2110212024 ^r -. . 1 n: o o COMMON ORDER 2l tr; &f ,. ) WP. Nos. 15426 of 1991 . ,/ PA . Ie 't, AND 18996 of 1995 l*,. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS. {r ff,,t,\ . JC01^\>
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.