ZORA SINGH v. RAJBIR KAUR AND ORS
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-09-30. ZORA SINGH v. RAJBIR KAUR AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
234. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHCHANDIGARH CRR-1607-2022 Date of decision: 30. 09. 2025 Zora Singh .... Petitioner Versus Rajbir Kaur and othersRajbir Kaur and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMARNAMIT KUMAR Present: None. ----- NAMIT KUMARNAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order datedChallenge in the present revision petition is to the order datedChallenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 27. 04. 2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib,27. 04. 2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib,27. 04. 2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib,27. 04. 2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the order dated 04.
whereby the appeal was dismissed and the order dated 04. whereby the appeal was dismissed and the order dated 04. 06. 2018 passed06. 2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, directing theby learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, directing theby learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, directing theby learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,000/petitioner to pay Rs. 2,000/- per month as maintenance and Rs. 1,000/per month as maintenance and Rs. 1,000/- per per month as rent accommodation to respondent No. 1month as rent accommodation to respondent No. 1month as rent accommodation to respondent No. 1-wife, was affirmed. 2. On 04. 09. 2024, the following order was passed:wing order was passed:- “As per office report, notice to respondent No. eport, notice to respondent No.
1-RajbirRajbir Kaur has been received back unserved with the report that sheKaur has been received back unserved with the report that sheKaur has been received back unserved with the report that she is not residing at the given address. is not residing at the given address. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to furnishLearned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to furnishLearned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to furnish correct/fresh address of respondent No. fresh address of respondent No. 1, within in a period of1, within in a period of 02 weeks from today. On his doing so, notice be issued to respondent No. 1 forOn his doing so, notice be issued to respondent No. 1 forOn his doing so, notice be issued to respondent No. 1 for 26. 03. 2025. ” CRR-1607-2022 - 2 - Thereafter, on the last date of hearing i. e. 12. 05. 2025, the following order was passed:- “As per office report, notice could not be issued to respondent No. 1 for want of correct address.
Let the needful be done within a period of two weeks from today. On doing so, fresh notice be issued to respondent No. 1, returnable on 30. 09. 2025. Copy of this order be forwarded to learned counsel for the petitioner for compliance. ” 3. As per office report, notice could not be issued to respondent No. 1 for want of correct address. 4. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing and today also, the position is the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE September 30, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.