MAHROOF v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Court: High Court of Uttarakhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Uttarakhand judgment dated 2024-08-14. MAHROOF v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 754 of 2024 Mahroof …..... Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …. …. Respondent Present:- Mr. Faizan, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR/Case Crime No. 547 of 2023 dated 24. 09. 2023, under Sections 3/5/11 of The Uttarakhand Protection Of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. 4. Learned State counsel admits this fact. It makes out the case for anticipatory bail. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail.
The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) He shall cooperate with the investigation. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case, if the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J. ) 14. 08. 2024 Sanjay
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.