Pechimuthu v. The State Rep. by Inspector of Police (Crime)
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2026-04-16. Pechimuthu v. The State Rep. by Inspector of Police (Crime). Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
CRL OP No. 9521 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9521 of 2026 Pechimuthu .. Petitioner Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police (Crime) S -9, Pazhavanthangal Police Station, Chennai - 600114 .. Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in the above Cr. No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner: Mr. S. Sathya Raj For Respondent: Mr. P. Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 318(4) of BNS in Crime No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis CRL OP No. 9521 of 2026 2.
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner. 3. In such circumstances, this Court is of the firm view that the respondent Police may be directed to follow the ratio as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2026 INSC 115) and 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1578 and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the F. I. R or close the petition enquiry within a period of two weeks from today. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry, on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant. 4.
With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 16-04-2026 SHL __________ Page2 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis CRL OP No. 9521 of 2026 To: 1. The Inspector of Police (Crime) S -9, Pazhavanthangal Police Station, Chennai – 600114 2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras __________ Page3 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis CRL OP No. 9521 of 2026 C. KUMARAPPAN J. SHL CRL OP No. 9521 of 2026 16-04-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.