THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD v. SMTI. JAMUNA DEVI AND 4 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2025-03-20. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD v. SMTI. JAMUNA DEVI AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC020001172025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/226/2024 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD REPRESENTED BY DIVISIONAL MANAGER DIVISIONAL OFFICE DIMAPUR NAGALAND-7971121 VERSUS SMTI. JAMUNA DEVI AND 4 ORS PERMANENT R/O SUKHANJAN NEPALI BASTI P. S. BOKAJAN KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM-782480 TEMPORARY R/O RIVER BELT COLONY DIMAPUR NAGALAND MOTHER OF LATE AMAR ARJEL 2:SHRI RIKHIRAM ARJEL FATHER OF LATE AMAR ARJEL PERMANENT R/O SUKHANJAN NEPALI BASTI P. S. BOKAJAN KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM-782480 TEMPORARY R/O RIVER BELT COLONY DIMAPUR NAGALAND 3:SHRI SHANKAR ARJEL BROTHER OF LATE AMAR ARJEL PERMANENT R/O SUKHANJAN NEPALI BASTI P. S. BOKAJAN KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM-782480 TEMPORARY R/O RIVER BELT COLONY DIMAPUR NAGALAND 4:SHRI BABUL CH TALUKDAR S/O LT. BANESHWAR KALITA R/O SATAGAON PRAGATI NAGAR VILLAGE WARD NO. 52 H. NO. 73 Page No.
# 2/2 4TH B/LANE UDAYANBIHAR GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781026 (OWNER OF BOLERO B/R NO AS-01 AR 9396) 5:SHRI ABDUL HAKIM TAPADAR S/O AMTAJ ALI TAPADAR R/O PAIKAN VOLLAGE PO-GUMRA BAZAR P. S. KATIGORAH DIST CACHAR ASSAM-788815 ------------ Advocate for : PFOSEKHO PFOTTE Advocate for : appearing for SMTI. JAMUNA DEVI AND 4 ORS BEFORE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 21. 03. 2025 1. Heard Mr. Pfosekho Pfotte, learned counsel for the appellant/applicant. Also heard Mr. Z. Kulnu, learned counsel for the claimants/respondents. 2. Mr. Pfosekho Pfotte, learned counsel for the appellant/applicant submits that there has been an amicable settlement between the parties, hence, the applicant/Insurance Company is not pressing this interlocutory application and prays for allowing the applicant to withdraw the same. 3. The prayer is allowed. 4. This interlocutory application is dismissed on withdrawal. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.