JOYNAL MONDAL v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-02-05. JOYNAL MONDAL v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010024742020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I. A. (Civil) 281/2020 1:JOYNAL MONDAL S/O ABDUR RASHID MONDDAL, R/O VILL. DAMRIVASHA, P. O. JOLESWAR, P. S. LAKHIPUR, DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783101 VERSUS 1:THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-110001 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN-785001 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN-785001 5:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI PIN-110001 Page No. # 2/2 6:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS (NRC) ASSAM PIN-78103 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A A DEWAN Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT. S. G. I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 05. 02.
2020 (Manojit Bhuyan, J) Heard Mr. A. A. Dewan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. G. Hazarika, learned CGC representing respondent no. 1; Ms. B. Das, learned standing counsel, Election Commission representing respondent no. 5; Mr. J. Payeng, learned standing counsel, Foreigners Tribunal representing respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 and Ms. U. Das, learned standing counsel, NRC representing respondent no. 6. The petitioner seeks modification of our order dated 20. 01. 2020 to the extent that the date of the order/opinion of the Tribunal has been incorrectly mentioned as “11. 12. 2017” instead of “11. 12. 2007”. We have perused the materials available on record and find that the correction sought for is a bona fide and requires to be granted. Accordingly, we modify our order dated 20. 01. 2020 passed in WP(C)/8454/2019 to the extent that reference made to the date “11. 12. 2017” shall now read as “11. 12. 2007”.
With the aforesaid modification, the Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.