THIMMAPPA S/O LATE BHEEMAPPA UPPAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-08-02. THIMMAPPA S/O LATE BHEEMAPPA UPPAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 48063 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH ND DATED THIS THE 2 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 48063 OF 2011 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: THIMMAPPA S/O LATE BHEEMAPPA UPPAR, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRI. , R/O: JANGAMARA KALGUDI, TQ: GANGAVATHI, THROUGH HIS GPA HOLDER, VENKANNA @ VENKATESH S/O LATE BHEEMAPPA UPPAR, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRI. , R/O. JANGAMARA KALGUDI, TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR. P. PATIL. , ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R REVENUE DEPARTMENT, Location: HIGH M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-01. COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE TAHASILDAR, GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL. 3. GURUSIDDAYYA S/O KOLA SHANTHAIAH. 4. NAGAPPA SHASTRI S/O NOT KNOWN. 5. SANGAPPA S/O NOT KNOWN. 6. BETTADAPPA. J. S/O NOT KNOWN. - 2 - WP No. 48063 of 2011 7. BASAVARAJ S/O NOT KNOWN. ALL ARE MAJOR, R/AT: JANGAMARAKALGUDI, TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRITILATA. R. PATIL. , HCGP FOR R1-R2; SRI. SABEEL AHMED AND SRI. A. S. PATIL. , ADVOCATES FOR R3-R7) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Smt. Kirtilata R. Patil. , learned HCGP for respondents 1 and 2 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 31. 07. 2024, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 02. 08. 2024. - 3 - WP No. 48063 of 2011 The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
As could be seen from the petition papers, the Writ Petition is filed in the year 2011. Now we are in the month of August 2024. The petition is pending for almost thirteen years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP LIST NO. : 2 SL NO. : 15
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.