JASWINDER SINGH v. NAINITAL BANK
Court: High Court of Uttarakhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Uttarakhand judgment dated 2025-11-17. JASWINDER SINGH v. NAINITAL BANK. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2025:UHC:10162 Of f i ce N o t e s, r e p o r t s, o r d e r s o r p r o ce e d i n g s SL. D a t e o r d i r e ct i o n s COURT’ S OR JUD GE’ S ORD ERS N o . a n d Re g i st r a r ’ s o r d e r w i t h Si g n a t u r e s W PM S/ 3 1 6 3 / 2 0 2 5 H o n ’ b l e M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J 1. Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, learned counsel for t he pet it ioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant , learned St anding Counsel for t he St at e of Ut t arakhand. 3. Mr. Anil Kum ar Joshi, learned counsel for t he respondent- Bank. 4. Pet it ioner is a guarant or. He has sought t he following reliefs in t his writ pet it ion: - ( i) I ssue a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ure of cert iorari quashing t he E-Auct ion Sale Not ice dat ed 17. 10. 2025 & 18. 10. 2025 published by t he respondent bank in English and Hindi Newspaper respect ively for auct ioning t he propert y bearing Khat a No. 57, Khasra No. 173 Min t ot al adm easuring 0.
8919 hect ares sit uat ed at Village Baksaura Jaspur- Kashipur Road, Dist rict Udham Singh Nagar ( hereinaft er referred t o as Propert y in Disput e) belonging t o t he pet it ioner ( who is a guarant or) , whereby t he dat e of E-Auct ion is fixed for 21. 11. 2025. ( Annexure No. 1) ( ii) I ssue a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ure of cert iorari quashing order dat ed 22. 01. 2020 passed by t he respondent no. 2 under sect ion 14 of t he SARFAESI Act ( Annexure No. 7) . ( iii) I ssue a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ure of Mandam us direct ing t he respondent bank not t o sell t he propert y in disput e belonging t o t he pet it ioner in pursuant t o t he e- auct ion not ice dat ed 17. 10. 2025 and 18. 10. 2025. 5. Learned counsel for t he Bank subm it s t hat securit izat ion applicat ion has been filed by principal borrower before Debt s Recovery Tribunal, in which pet it ioner is also added as applicant no. 4.
Thus, he subm it s t hat pet it ioner 2025:UHC:10162 cannot now be perm it t ed t o file separat e pet it ion challenging t he possession not ice and t he subsequent st eps t aken by t he Bank Aut horit ies. 6. This Court finds subst ance in t he said subm ission m ade by learned counsel for t he Bank. Since securit izat ion applicat ion was filed by principal borrower in which pet it ioner is also a part y, t herefore, pet it ioner cannot be perm it t ed t o file separat e writ pet it ion, challenging t he possession not ice. 7. The writ pet it ion is, accordingly, disposed of wit h libert y t o pet it ioner t o pursue his rem edy before Debt s Recovery Tribunal. However, t his order will not preclude pet it ioner from m oving applicat ion before Debt s Recovery Tribunal for appropriat e relief. ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J) 17. 11. 2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGHDigitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWALDN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,2. 5. 4.
20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3,postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, ASWAL serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWALDate: 2025. 11. 17 05:16:54 -08'00'
Source: High Court of Uttarakhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.