Habeeb Mohammed v. The Union of India
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: PULLA KARTHIK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-19. Habeeb Mohammed v. The Union of India. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3301 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 35070 OF 2024 Between: Habeeb Mohammed, S/o Wahiduddin, Aged about 38 years, Occ; Unemployee, Fl/o H. No. 24-5-235, Darga Kazipet, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Union of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi. 2. The Director, National lnstitute of Technology, Warangal. .....
RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the representation dated OB-07 -2024 and 29-10-202'1 to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, u nco nstitutiona l, discriminatory, contrary to the orders of this Honorable Court in W. P. No. '1 331 ot 2021 , violative of principles of natural justice, and violative ot Arl. 12, 14 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner duly considering the above representations. I. A.
:1 0F 2024 Petition Under Section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 2nd respondent to provide suitabre emproyment to the petitioner under compassionate appointment by considering the representations dated 0g_07_ 2024 and 29-10-2021 pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI R. RAJA SHEKAR NA|K counselforthe Respondent No. 1 : sRr N. RAVi, REPRESENTTNG sRr GAD| PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUry SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : SRI T. MAHENDER RAO The Court made the following ORDER I I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No. 35O7O OF 2o24 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge rejection order No. A-38017/29 12O24-Admn, 15. 12. 2024, passed by respondent No. 2. 2.
Permission, as sought for, is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed withdrawn granting liberty as sought for by the petitioner. There sha1l be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this . T petition shall stand closed. SD/. L. LAKSHMT T REGIS ASSIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION I ToR str,$Eii4=srilfiIf{g3Ftj? +"sJ,"l 2 3ffi 33 B sEl 3 S:i[Zttt''T1l'it"oJ#r? *RAo,Advocate(oPuc) 4 Two CD CoPies SA BSK *,, )-- l I HIGH COURT DATED:1911212024 i ig STA 1t ORDER WP. No. 35070 of 2024 0 i 1:. r 2[25 a' ) t oEsrra+/ i: DISMISSING THE W. P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. a r\r<
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.