Skip to main content
LawSphereX

PALADUGULA SATYAVATHI, KHAMMAM DIST v. LANKA RAVI, KHAMMAM DIST AND 2 OTHERS

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: G SRI DEVI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-30. PALADUGULA SATYAVATHI, KHAMMAM DIST v. LANKA RAVI, KHAMMAM DIST AND 2 OTHERS. Read the judgment...

Judgment text

,,/, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI t CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2335 OF 2014 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order daled. 11-02-2014 made in 1. A. No. 153 of 2013 in O. S. No. 66 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Kothagudem. Betwee n: Paladugula Satyavathi, W/o Raghavaiah, aged 62 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nellipaka Banjar Village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District. ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff AND 1. Lanka Ravi, S/o. Appa Rao, aged 40 years, Occ: Nil, Rio. Nellipaka Banjara village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District. 2. Pediredla Rani, W/o ltrlaheshwar Rao, aged 45 years, Occ: Housewife, Rio. Nellipaka Banjara village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam, District. 3. Gummalla Vijayalaxmi, W/o. Late Venkata Rama Chandra Rao, aged 65 years, Occ: Housewife, Fl/o.

Nellipaka Banjara village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District. ... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI M. SUDHIR KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER IION'BLI1 Jl-,S'l'lCE G. SItl DI'. \'l (. IvII, RE\/ISION P[- TITIO N No. 2335 of 201,1 ORDI]It This revision petition is filed challenging tlie order dated I 1. 02. 2014. passed by the Principal . lunior Civil Jtrdge. Kothaguclc-m. in 1. ,\. No. l5l o1'20 13 in O. S. No. 66 ol201l \\'hcn the nratter is taken up. it is broLrght to thc noticc ol this ( ou11 that O. S. No. (r(r of 20 li itscll'has becn ciisposcd of b1' thc tlial ( ()url ()n ll. ()S. l()lS. lrr r ieri ol tltc slittte. Itrrll'titt{. 1 sLttr ir c: lir' lcljLrdication in this rclisiort petition I hc Cir il Rcvision Petition is accordingll disnrissetl as inll'uctr. Lor. rs. No order as to costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneor-rs applications. if arr1,. shalI stand c Ioscci, sD/- l.

NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTAN T REG TRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Khammam District' at Kothagude'm' Civil Judge' 1 The Principal Junior Cf 'd" p pr"nr'axat'Ceoov' novocat"- 2 id il :,i lgIU a Kumar' Advocate [oPUC] . i"" iC,iisn tv sudhir 4. Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:3011212020 $E si. q )E o/ ( o z o 1 ? . tAr'l 2021 i a . L * o PAT ORDER CRP. No. 2335 of 2014 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.