KABIR DAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: ALOK MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 2024-12-03. KABIR DAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79968 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11495 of 2024 Petitioner :- Kabir Das Respondent :- State Of U. P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the respondent no. 2- Deputy Director, Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, Pallia Kala, Lakhimpur Kheri to forthwith grant the minimum of the pay-scale of Rs. 18,000/- as per 7th Pay Commission, alongwith arrears since March, 2018 in terms of the judgment and order dated 17. 11. 2018 passed by this Court in Writ A No. 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and Another Vs. State of U. P. and others) and with further prayer to consider and decide the representation dated 04. 11. 2024. 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Class-IV post in December, 2005 and he has continuously been functioning on the said post. After coming of 7th Pay Commission, the petitioner has made representation dated 04. 112024 before respondent no. 2 for grant of minimum of pay scale of Rs. 18000/- as per 7th Pay Commission but no decision has been taken by the respondent no. 2 and the matter is still pending. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that respondent no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner mentioned hereinabove within the time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6.
On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 04. 11. 2024 in accordance with law and keeping in view the judgment and order dated 17. 11. 2018 passed by this Court in the case of Mohan Swaroop (supra) within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Alok Mathur, J. ) Order Date :- 3. 12. 2024/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: Allahabad High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.