SANJAY TIWARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-04-27. SANJAY TIWARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
2026:JHHC:12245 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 6871 of 2023 ----- Sanjay Tiwary, S/o Late Jagatanand Tiwary, R/o Industry Colliery, P. O. -Dhansar, P. S. -Jharia, Dist. -Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, having its office at P. O. & P. S. - Dhanbad, District - Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, having its office at P. O. & P. S. - Dhanbad, District - Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 3. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dhanbad, having its office at P. O. & P. S. - Dhanbad, District - Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 4. The Circle Officer, Dhanbad, P. O. & P. S. - Dhanbad, District - Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad, having its office at P. O. & P. S. - Dhanbad, District - Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 6. The Officer-in-Charge, Sariadhela P. S. , having its office at P. O. & P. S. - Sariadhela, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 7. Nirmala Devi, Wife of Suresh Giri. 8.
Suresh Giri, S/o Late Bhagwan Giri, Respondent Nos. 7 & 8 both are R/o Kola Kusuma, P. O. -K. G. Ashram, P. S. -Seraidhela, Dist. -Dhanbad, Jharkhand … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sabsanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mohan Kr. Dubey, AC to AG …...... 06/ 27. 04. 2026 Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition for direction upon the respondent authorities to take action for removal of the encroachment over Gair Abad Khata No. 142, Mouza No. 12, Mouza Kola Kusma, Plot No. 17, Area 2. 25 decimals. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he has approached the respondents, but the respondents have taken no action. 4.
In view of the aforesaid fact, I direct the respondents that if the encroachment has been established by the competent Court having jurisdiction and the same needs to be removed, the respondents are expected to take steps immediately for removal of the same. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending, I. A. , if any stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J. ) th 27 April, 2026 R. S. /SKC/CP-2 Uploaded on 07/05 /2026
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.