Sri. Narravula Venkata Bhaskar Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.MADHAVI DEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-16. Sri. Narravula Venkata Bhaskar Reddy v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
321e [ ] OF TELANGANA HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER rWO THOUSNND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI o31 0F 2024 WRIT PETtr{oN NO:35 Betweenl Sri. NarravulaVenkataBhaskarReddy,s/o. -NarravulaVenkataRamiReddy,Aged Kakativa Nasar' Beside water 60 ;;;;;:'o;.. Fiir"t" r*drovi. "nvolnNo-z+-tto' ulstrlct' Tank, Ramachandrapuram, Sangareddy ..... PETITIONER AND Raj '1 rep by its Principal Secretary Panchayat . The State of Telangana, ' Sbcreta riat Bui ld in g' H yd era bad' o""pu-tini"n1, seiiei"riai, Chitkul 2. The Executive Officer/Panchayat Secretary' Grama Panchayat -prtancheru Vif"gl, Mandal, Sangareddy District' .....
RESPONDENTS praying that in the of the Constitution of lndia Petition Under Article 226 circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe particularly one in writ, order or direction more pleased to issue an appropriate thenatureofWritofMandamusquestioningtheactionoftheRespondentNo. 2in issuingimpugnedUrgentNoticevideLr'NoGPCt51t2O24'DL07-12-2024 in for construct a House Sy' No' 336lEl1 cancelling the permission granted Grampanchayat of Patbncheru Mandal' situated at Chitkul Village, Chitkul permission No' GPC/38/2O24' dt' 28-08'2024 without Sangareddy district vide issuingshow-causenoticeasillegal,arbitraryandagainstTelanganaPanchayat RajAct20lsandinviolationofprinciplesofnatural,iustice,andcontrarytoArticle of lndia. consequently set-aside the Urgent 21 and 300A of the constitution NoticevideLr. No. GPC/51t2o24,Dt. 07-12-2024issuedbythe2ndRespondent. l. A. NO.
1 0F 2024 Petition Under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend impugned Urgent Notice vide Lr. No. Gpc/5. 1/2024, Dt. o7t12t2024 issued by the 2nd Respondent in respect of House in sy. No. 336/E/1 situated at chitkur vi'age, chitkur Grampanchayat patancheru of Mandar, Sangareddy district, pending disposar of the prdlent writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the petitioner : SRI PALLE SRIHARINATH Respondent No. 1 ! :yf"-! ltltre : Gp FoR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : SRI R. CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY The Court made the following ORDER i. r '{1lt}. 1"t T. MADHAVI DEVI THE HONOURABI,E SMT. JT'STICE WRIT PETITION No. 3sO31 of2024 ORDER: filed, under Article 226 of This writ petition is seeking the following relief: Constitution of India, o. urit, order or direction more . .
to issue an appropiate wnt of piiortorlg on"'in the nature of ^Mandamus -q;"tiio;i;g the action of the Respondenl y9'? -i. n issuins ;;i;g;"i' Urgent Notiie uid'e Lr'No'GPC/ 51/ 2024 Dt consttact oi. li. ZoZ+ cincelling the permission granted for vitloge' situated at Chitkul L uoi.. in sg. wo. 536/a/1 Mandal' Sangareddg initrut Grampinchagat of Patancheru No. GPC/38/2024 dt 28'08'2024 ii"t ia uide-permisiion and couse notice as illegal' arbitrary uithout issuiig shottt Ro,j Act, 2018 and in uiolation i. hn{ono Panchagat "i"i". i to Article' 21 and oi oinciples if nanral and contrary iuslice Consequentlg set. aside the iioi . fri ionstirutiin of India Dt 07'12'2024 Lr. No. GPC/51/2024 ,r;""i Notice uide and to pass" isiued- bg the 2nd Respondent '" t I that the for the petitioner submitted 2. Learned counsel petitioner was not a party to the suits uide O'S'No'567 of in the notice' dated of 2023 mentioned 2O2O andO. S. No. 1258 the said schedule property mentioned in 07. 12.
2024, and the property of the petitioner' He further suits is also not the demonstrate that of the petitioner to referred to the sale deed not with regard to his property afe the boundaries mentioned l- 1:.. I the same as the schedule property mentioned in the suits ujde O. S. No. 567 of 2O2O arrd O. S. No. 1258 of 2023. 3 ' In view of the above, this court is satisfied that the petitioner was not a party in the said suits and therefore, it is not understandable as to how the impugned order has been passed without issuing aly notice to the petitioner. 4. In view of the same, the impugned notice is set aside ard accordingly, writ petition is allowed. There shiill be no order as to costs. 5. Miscelianeous petitions, if aly, pending shall staad closed. SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// :J SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Secretariat quild! 11S, State of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2.
The Executive Officer/Panchayat Secretary, Grama panchayat Chitkul Villag_e, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District. - 3. Two CCs to Gp FoR PANCHAYAT RAJAND RURAL DEVELOpIVENT, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OU! 4. One CC to SRI PALLE SR|HAR|NATH, Advocat-e tOpUCI 5. Two CD Copies SA BS t_ a I :r. C. C. TODAY HIGH COURT TMD,J DATED:1611212024 :=::::. ii .! i i-c (' t' L) 1ff BiC fifl ORDER '': WP. No. 35031 D5 jlr),! of 2024 r'' DISPOSING OF THE W. P WITHOUT COSTS. 4 /,t /t+ I
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.