S. Shravan Kumar v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-03. S. Shravan Kumar v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
\ 3302 ] [ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 5745 OF 2022 Between: S. Shravan Kumar, S/o S. Simhachary, Aged 51 years, R/o H. No. 1-8-353, Near RTC Kalabhavan. Chikkadpalli, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, T. S. Secretariat. Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ralendra Nagar Division. RR District. -The 4 Tahsildar' serilingampallv Mandal' Ransa Reddv o'tt''ll*ar"oNDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that tn the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or partrcularly ore in the nature of Writ of lt4andamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.
3, 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his Plot No. 226, admeasuring 300 Sq. yds in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from her plot without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of her Plot No. 226, admeasuring 300 Sq. yds, comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, sltuated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without folc winq due process of law and without issuing notice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petrtion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r )umstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr I , be pleased to direct Respondent No. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates nol t, interfere with the possession of the Petitioner in respect of her Plot No 216, admeasuring 300 Sq. yds, comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase ll,V r ayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Re r dy District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MS PORIKA ABINANDANA MAt.. r Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER . :) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH MIT PETITION No. 5745 of 2022 THE O3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: S. Shravan Kumar ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep.
by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, H),derabad & Three others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Ms. Porika Abinandana Mala, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner hled the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the lencing stones in respect of petitioner's Plot No. 226, admeasuring 300 Sq. yards in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopalpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranil . Reddy District (for brevity, "the subject property") and threater)rr g to disltossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing I ny notice ar. ld rr ithour follorving due process of law, as illegal anr I arbitrary,. 3.
Learned counsel lor the petitioner further sr r mit s that *,hile admitting the matter, this court passed int e. r i n orcrer dated 22. O2. 2022 *,ith a drrection to maintain status qrt, existing as on that clate until the ncxL date of hearing in resp,:,; of the subject propertv. Hou,ever, in spite of lapse of more thiL I three ar-id half years, the respondent authorities did not file a corr rter or a vacate petition denying the avcrments made by the petit r ner in the writ affidavit. In view of the same, learned couns.. requested this Court to allou, the Writ petition by directing 1re responclent authorities not to interfere with the possession of I re petitioner in respect to the subject property without followine 1ue process of Iaw. 4.
On the other hand, learned Assistant Gover r ment Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is in prr rsession of the subject property, the respondents will not intr: fere with the petitioner's possession over the subject property, u i hout follou. ing due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders. 5. In vierv of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property, without following due procedure of iaw. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed sD/'AHi?. fAoJTt:3,1+ffi / G //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, T of Telangana' S' Department of Revenue' State 1 The Principal Secretary, Secretariai. HYderabad' Ranga Reddy District' 2 The District Collector, 3 TheRevenueDivisionalofficer,RajendraNagarDivision. RRDistrict.
Mandal' Ranga Reddy District' 4 The Tahsildar, Serilingampally MALA Advocate IOPUC] One CC to SRI PORIKA ABINANDANA 5 of Court for the State Telangana at FOR REVENUE' High 6 Two CCs to GP Hyderabad . [OUT] 7 Two CD CoPies DAN J HIGH COURT DATED:0311212025 1'ttr SIA rB C) \ (J I 6 JAN 2il26 ORDER ir '11 * WP. No. 5745 of 2022 a)to t,ATC DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o \
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.