GANGUMALLA HAREESH REDDY v. MADI REDDY NARAYANA REDDY
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: PULLA KARTHIK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-24. GANGUMALLA HAREESH REDDY v. MADI REDDY NARAYANA REDDY. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 3301 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENW FOURTH DAYOFAPRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK Petition under Article 221 ot the constitution of lndia praying to allow the civil revision petition by directing the principal Junior civil Judge'at Gajlwel to dispose off the pending tnterlocutory Apptications tANo. 125t2025 in bs tto. gilzozs before going for trial of the suit in os No. 91/20 17 on the flte of the principal Junior civil Judge at Gajwel in the interest of justice. BETWEEN: 1. GANGUMALLA HAREESH REDDY, S/o Late G. Anji Reddy, Aged about 46 Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/o. 1-8-32, Chikkadpilly, Iegrs, Hyderabad, Telangana-500020. 2. GANGUMALI-A SRTNATH REDDY, S/o Late G. Anji Reddy, Aged about 48 y9q1s, Pvt Emptoyee, R/o. 1 -8-32, Chikkadpaily, HyderabaJ, Tetangana_ -Occ. 500020. ... REVISION PETITIONERS/PETIIIOTTERS'PLAINTI FFS EIIT' 1. MADI REDDY NARAYANA REDDY, S/o M.
Bagi Reddy, Aged about 62 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 2-29, Muneerabad . Village, i Bommalaramaram Mandal, yadadri Bhongir District. i 2. MADI REDDY JAYAMMA, Wo M. Narayana Redcty, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. No. 2-28, Muneerabad Viitage, Bornmalaramaram l Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. i II ri Petition under order 39, Rule 1 & 2, R A/ . section 151 of cpc praying that in the I circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitioh, ftre'nign court may be pleased to grant Ad-lnterim lnjunction orders in favour of p;titioners restraining the Respondents, their henchmen, agenb, representatives, any person or persons claiming . through them from interfering with the peaceful possession and lr enjoyment of F'etitioners over the Petition Schedule Property till the deciding of the !. A. No. 125 of 2025 on merits. All that the Agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 3-22 Gts in Sy. No. 601/AAl1 and Ac. 0-01 Gts irr Sy. No.
601/AA/2 together admeasuring Ac. 3-23 Gts. , situated at Tuniki Kalsa Village and Grampanchayath, Wargat Mandat, Siddipet District and bounded on: NORTH Land in Sy. No. 527 SOUTH Land in Sy. No. 601 and 602 EAST Vagu WEST Land in Sy. No. 600 Counsel for ther Petitioners: Sri. K. pradeep Reddy Counsel for the' Respondents: - - - The Court madr: the following: ORDER H IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I{ARTHIK z4thApril, 2026 Between: Gangumalla Hareesh Reddy & another. Petitioners AND Madi Reddy Narayana Reddy & another. Respondents ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,'is filed being aggrieved by the orders passed in I. A. No. L25 of 2o2s in O. S. No. 91 of 2025 dated 6. 5. 2025 on the file of the learned principal Junior Civil Judge, Gajwel. 2. Heard Sri K. Pradeep Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners.
During the course of arguments, the learned counsel confined his prayer seeking direction to the court below to dispose of the pending application i. e. I. A. No. 125 of 2o2s in o. s. No. 9l of 2025 within a reasonable period of time. 3. A perusal of the record, it discloses that the learned principal Junior Civil Judge, Gajwel has initially granted ad-interim injunction in favour of petitioners/plaintiffs vide order dated 6. 5. 2025 in I. A. No. 125 of 2025 in O. S. No. 91 of 2025 and thereafter, the said order was extended on Lo. 6-21)25, 27. 6. 2o2s, T;8. 2o2s, 4. 9. 2o2s, T. Lo. 2o2s and on 21. L1. 2O25. The interim order was extended till 22. L2. 2O25. Thereafter, there was rto extension and without extending the order, the matter was simply adjourned to 29. L. 2o26,26. 2. 2026, s. 3. 2o26 and L2. 3. 2026. 4. In view of the above and without going into merits of the matter, it is appropri:tte to direct the learned principal Junior civil Judge, Gajwel to dispose . f [. A. No.
r25 of 2o2s in o. s. No. 91 of 2o2s, as expeditiousry as possible, preferably before Summer Vacation, 2026. 5. The c)ivil Revision petition is accordingly disposed of. pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No costs. SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// G- SECTION OFFICER To, Principal Junior Civit Judge, At 1 Inu Gajwet. 2. One CC to Sri. K. pradeep Reddy, Advocate tOpUCI 3. Two CD Copies GNK M. ll I l, ,, ,r HIGH COURT D ATED: 2410412026 HES r:. :'', ' "{ I () i: l? fi ? rl'7fi z5 * ORDER GRP. No. 1280 of 2026 DISPOSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOI. ,T COSTS 5 I \
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.