C.Lalkhalha and 15 Ors. v. Sh Lallawmawma
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-09-09. C.Lalkhalha and 15 Ors. v. Sh Lallawmawma. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC030000562024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont. Cas(C)/2/2024 C. Lalkhalha and 15 Ors. S/o Lawnga (L). Keifang, Saitual District, Mizoram 2: Hrangthuama 3: Ranghnuna (L) 4: Sangthluaii (L) 5: Nuthangi 6: Rosangzuala 7: P. Vala (L) 8: Zorampari 9: H. Biakmawia (L) 10: KN Lalnunzira (L) 11: Rosangmawia 12: C. Lalrosanga Page No. # 2/3 13: Lalthuampuii (L) 14: Laldawngliana 15: Zodinliana 16: P. Vanlalhriat VERSUS Sh Lallawmawma The Competent Authority for Land Acquisition/Additional Deputy Commissioner, Saitual Distrtict, Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Lalngaihsaki Fanai BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 10. 09. 2024 Heard Mr. Zoramchhana, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. Lalngaihsaki Fanai, learned counsel for the sole respondent. 2.
By filing this application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioners draws the attention of this Court the alleged wilful non-compliance of the respondent in compliance with the direction made by this Court in the Order dated 01. 12. 2023 passed in WP(C) No. 147/2023. Page No. # 3/3 3. Today, when the matter was called, Ms. Lalngaihsaki Fanai, learned counsel for the sole respondent submitted that the representation of the petitioners has been disposed of in terms of the Court’s Order dated 01. 12. 2023 passed in WP(C) No. 147/2023 against which the aforesaid contempt petition has been filed. She further submit a copy of the Order dated 09. 09. 2024 issued by the Addl. Deputy Commissioner & Competent Authority for Land Acquisition Saitual District, Saitual, whereby the representation of the petitioners dated 06. 02. 2024 is disposed of. 4. The said Order dated 09. 09.
2024 is kept on record and marked as ‘X’. 5. Perusal of the aforesaid Order dated 09. 09. 2024 indicates that the respondent has considered and disposed of the representation of the petitioners as directed by this Court by Order dated 01. 12. 2023. As such, nothing survives for adjudication in the present contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. Disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.