Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Maruti Rao Waghmare v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: T.MADHAVI DEVI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-16. Maruti Rao Waghmare v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

+ [ 321e I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 37718 OF 2025 Between: Maruti Rao waghmare, s/o. Moti Ram waghmare, Aged about. 71 years, occ ; Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 21-4-107411, Char Mahal, Petla Burj, Bahadurpur, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 002. .. PETITIONER AND 1. The state of relangana, Rep. by its Principal secretary (Revenue), central Secretariat, Khairtabad, Hyderabad- 500 022, Telangana. 2. The First Appelleant Authority (RTl Act), Office of the District Collector - Ranga Reddy District lhtegrated District Office Complex, Kongarakalan, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Telangana 3. The Public lnformation Officer (PlO), Office of the Revenue Divisional Office (RDO) Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. .....

RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particutarty one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned order bearing Proceedings No. AS/RTI/1732012025 dated 1611012025 passed by the Additional Collector (Revenue), Rangareddy District (Respondent No. 2), as aibitrary, iltegal, unconstitutional, violative of the principles of natural justice, and set aside the same and consequentty direct the Respondents to furnish the information as sought in RTI Application dated 0110712025. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI THAKUR INDRAJIT SINGH Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY The Court made the following ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT No. 3771a oF 2025 DATE: 16. L2. 2O25 Between: Maruti Rao Waghmare ..

Petitioner AND The State of Telangana & 2 others ... Respondents ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner is challenglng the ord. er dt. 16. 1o. 2025 passed by the 1"t appellate authority, disposing of the appeal by obserwing that the 3. d respondent has already furnished the information sought for, that is available in the office, as illegal and aibitrary. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner fiIed an RTI application before respondent No. 3 seeking to provide digital geospatial data' and the Assistant public Information \ \ \ officer (APIO) has informed. that during the suryey, the geospatiat co-ordinates are not recorded and therefore, the requested information cannot be furnished. I I 3. Learned Government pleader I for Information & Technologz ij i has furnished copy of the written instructions received by him and i I submitted that information which tt was available in the office of the ! 3'd respondent has been furnished.

He further submitted that I there is a provision of Appeal before the state Information commission and the petitioner has not availed the same. 4- Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submitted that survey was conducted using GPS enabled devices and therefore geospatial co-ordinates would be available and the reason given by PIO is not correct. 5. since the 1st appellate authority does not seem to have considered the contentions of the petitioner, the impugned order dt. 16. 1o. 2o25 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the l"t appellate authority for re-consideration and passing of appropriate orders- 6. Accordingly, the petition writ is_ disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscelraneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/. A. H. S. GOWRI SHANKAR REGI //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary, (Revenue), Central Khairtabad, State of Telangana at Hyderabad- 500 022,Telangana. 2.

The First Appellant Authority (RTl Act), Office of the District Collector - Ranga Reddy District lntegrated District Office Complex, Kongarakalan, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Telangana. I I 3' The Public lnformation officer(Plo), office of the Revenue Divisionat office -"'-'',, - FDo-)_cr,"yqlLlp! yi. sjo! , Rrnp? oi;tii. i, r"uns;;; neqov 4. One CC to SRt THAKUR TNDRAJ|T SI'NGH:Ajvocate"[OFUC] 5' Two ccs to GP FoR INFORMATIoN Arv-o trcnnot6cv, iligh court for the State of Telangana -- _ at Hyderabad tOUn 6. Two CD Copies SA LS w ''i. : .. -- . 1- -. - . ^ HIGH COURT DATED i1611212025 i i'ii: i 1) 24 EiC m[ ,) ORDER WP. No. 37718 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W. P WITHOUT COSTS q*t+ \- #,,

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.