SUSHANTA PRASAD NAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2024-12-24. SUSHANTA PRASAD NAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 31853 of 2024 Sushanta Prasad Naik ..... Petitioner Mr. P. K. Mahapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S. K. Jee, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 24. 12. 2024 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it is humbly prayed that the writ petition may be allowed; And (A) a writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ may be issued commanding the opposite parties to antedate regularization of the services of the petitioner from 2002 instead of 16. 03. 2022 in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court rendered in the case of State of Karnataka and others Vs.
Uma Devi and others reported in AIR 2006 SC 1806 and the decision of this Hon'ble Court rendered in the case of Sagarilal Murmu Vs State of Odisha and others (W. P. (C) No. 21617 of 2013 disposed of on 28. 07. 2015 and batch of cases), with all consequential service and financial benefits, within a time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court; (B) And any other order direction / directions / orders or may be issued so as to give complete relief to the petitioner; Page 1 of 2. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall remain ever pray. ” 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has filed an application at Annexure-6 to the Writ Petition before the Opp. Party No. 2, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No. 2 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period. 5.
Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No. 2 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 13-Jan-2025 13:23:51 Page 2 of 2.
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.