SANCHIT GULERIA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2025-10-17. SANCHIT GULERIA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16474 of 2025 th Decided on: 17 October, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanchit Guleria ….. Petitioner Versus State of H. P. and others ..... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Munish Datwalia and Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhry, learned Assistant Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 03. 10.
2025 (Annexure P-9) seeking applicability of Nitin Thakur Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. Ors. has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Assistant Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 03. 10.
2025 (Annexure P-9) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Nitin 2 Thakur within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 17, 2025 Judge Mukesh CWP No. 4971 of 2024, decided alongwith connected matters on 23. 9. 2025
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.