DALEEP SINGH v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-06-27. DALEEP SINGH v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
( 2024:HHC:4137 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5902/2024. th Date of Decision: 27 June, 2024. Daleep Singh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. ….. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms. Kusum Lata, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for respondents. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral). Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following substantive reliefs: -a) “That the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for his transfer from GMS Kanoyla (Upperla) u/c GSSS Nand, District Solan, HP to GMS Nalang u/c GSSS Barmana, District Bilaspur, HP keeping in view of his disability and hardships and in view of mutual consent.
” b) “That the respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation dated 14. 06. 2024 Annexure P-3 pending before the respondent No. 2 in a time bound manner. ” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an appropriate representation stands filed with the respondents/authorities with respect to the grievances being raised in the present petition. 4. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that representation so filed by the present petitioner, which is appended along with the petition as Annexure P3, shall be decided within a reasonable time of four weeks. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, nothing survives to be adjudicated, in the case at hand. 6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous, so also, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge th 27 June, 2024 (Gaurav Rawat)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.