VINCY PETER, v. UZHAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYTH,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-08-05. VINCY PETER, v. UZHAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYTH,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. TH MONDAY, THE 5 DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 27778 OF 2024 PETITIONER: VINCY PETER AGED 54 YEARS W/O. SHAJI MATHEW, RESIDING AT CHIRAYIL HOUSE, PURAKKATTU P. O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688561 BY ADVS. SHYSON P. MANGUZHA AUGUSTUS S. MANGUZHA PAUL S. MANGUZHA RESPONDENTS: 1 UZHAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYTH RESPERSENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, UZHAVOOR P. O, KOTTAYAM,, PIN - 686634 2 THE SECRETARY UZHAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYTH, UZHAVOOR P. O, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686634 BY ADV SUNIL CYRIAC OTHER PRESENT: SRI. SUNIL CYRIAC, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05. 08. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 27778 OF 2024 MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. , J. =============================== W. P(C) No. 27778 of 2024 ================================ th Dated this the 5 day of August, 2024 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.
P2 show cause notice issued on the allegations that on account of running a hotel of the petitioner, water in the well of the complainant’s property is contaminated. The petitioner submits that there was no hearing, and a copy of the alleged complaint was not served. She has given Ext. P3 objections as against Ext. P2. nd 2. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2 respondent to consider the objections preferred by the petitioner and to pass orders on the same within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It shall be done with notice to the petitioner and also to the person who made the complaint which led to the passing of Ext. P2 order. Since the petitioner is stated to be running a business, the petitioner will be allowed to function till the orders are passed by the Panchayat as directed above. The petitioner will however ensure that no contamination is caused to the complainant’s well water. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. JUDGE LU WP(C) NO. 27778 OF 2024 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27778/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT-P1 THE TRUE COPY OF LICENSE BEARING NO. JC3- 2280/209/2024-25 DATED 20-06-2024, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT-P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE STOP MEMO DATED 30-07- 2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT-P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30-07- 2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT-P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT DATED 31-07-2024 ISSUED FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT PANCHAYAT // True Copy // PA To Judge
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.