SRI PANCHAKSHARI v. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: E.S.INDIRESH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-03-03. SRI PANCHAKSHARI v. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 506 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU RD DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 506 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. PANCHAKSHARI, S/O. SHIVABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT CHOWDENHALLI VILLAGE, THORENAAVINAHALLI POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARUN J. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA, Digitally signed by ND 2 FLOOR, CHAYA S A Location: HIGH TUMKUR - 572 101. COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, TIPTUR SUB DIVISION, TIPTUR TALUK, TIPTUR, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 201. 3. SMT. J. SUSHEELAMMA, W/O. T. S. KUMARSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT THOREMAVINAHALLI POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, - 2 - WP No. 506 of 2026 TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 4. M. S. VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O. SHIVANNA MJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT N.
NLAVANAHALLI, NEERAGUNDA POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 5. SRI. B. J. DAYANANDA, S/O. JAGADEESH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT BLSUVANAHALLI, ANEKERE POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 6. SRI. L. A. MANJUNATH, S/O. ALLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT LOKA MNANA HALLI VILLAGE, THOREMAVANAHALLI POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 7. SRI. T. S. KUMARASWAMY, S/O. SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT THOREMUVINAHALLI POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 8. SRI. OMKARAMURTHY, S/O. SADASHIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT N. MAVINAHALLI VILLAGE, NEERAGUNDA POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. - 3 - WP No. 506 of 2026 9. SRI. T. M. ASHOK KUMAR, S/O. MALLIKARJUNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT THOREMAVINAHALLI POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 10. SMT. N. KAVYA, W/O. PUNEETH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT N. GANGANAHALLI, NEERAGUNDA POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 11. SRI.
SHIVARUDRAPPA, S/O. SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT BHUVANAHALLI PALYA, ANEKERE POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 12. SRI. M. DAYANANDA, S/O. MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT MANTRIKENAHALLI, GOLLARAHATTI, THOREMAVANAHALLI POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 13. SRI. M. G. LOKESHA, S/O. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT N. NAVINAHALLI, NEERAGUNDA POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 14. SRI. HARSHA, AGED MAJOR, - 4 - WP No. 506 of 2026 SUPERVISOR, DCC BANK, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. 15. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, THOREMAVANAHALLI POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R15) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11. 11. 2025 BEARING NO.
SANI34/29(C)/05/2025-26 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING in 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 11. 11. 2025 passed by respondent No. 2 - 5 - WP No. 506 of 2026 (Annexure-C) and order dated 20. 12. 2025 passed by respondent No. 1 (Annexure-G). 2. Heard Sri. Varun J. Patil, learned counsel appearing for petitioner, Sri. Yogesh D. Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri. Devi Prasad Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 3 to 15. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, as the petitioner herein is assailing the order of disqualification before respondent No. 1 in Appeal No.
4/2025 and the said appeal is pending consideration before the said authority and the ends of the justice would be met if respondent No. 1 is directed to dispose of the appeal with an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 4. It is also made clear that, till the conclusion of the proceedings before respondent No. 1, the order dated 12. 01. 2026 passed by this Court shall remain in operation. - 6 - WP No. 506 of 2026 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E. S. INDIRESH) JUDGE KLV List No. : 1 Sl No. : 61
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.