Skip to main content
LawSphereX

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER AND ORS v. CHIKURI RADHA SHREELAXMI

Court: High Court of Karnataka

Bench: SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-12-18. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER AND ORS v. CHIKURI RADHA SHREELAXMI. Read the judgment and case...

Judgment text

- 1 - MFA No. 203996 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH TH DATED THIS THE 18 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 203996 OF 2024 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER, UKP BHEEMARAYANGUDI, TQ: SHAHAPUR, DIST: YADGIRI 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KALABURAGI 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KBJNL, KR CIRCLE, BENGALURU …APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y. H. VIJAYAKUMAR, AAG ALONG WITH SRI VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP) AND: CHIKURI RADHA SHREELAXMI W/O SITARM SRIVENKATA SRINIVAS, AGE: 47 OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: WADGERA VILLAGE, TQ: YADRAMI, DIST: KALABURAGI …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 74(1) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, PRAYING TO, A) CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN LAC NO. 234/2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AND LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY, KALABURAGI DT. 13. 09.

2024 B) ALLOW THE - 2 - MFA No. 203996 of 2024 ABOVE APPEAL AND TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND AWARD DT. 13. 09. 2024 IN LAC NO. 234/2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AND THE LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY, KALABURAGI. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) The present appeal, filed under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, challenges the judgment dated 13. 09. 2023 in LAC No. 234/2022. However, the appeal is filed after a delay of 363 days beyond the statutory limitation period of 120 days prescribed under Section 74(1) of the Act. This Court, following the Division Bench ruling in MFA No. 102543/2022 dated 23. 09.

2024, holds that the limitation period under the Act is mandatory and non-extendable. Relying on precedents, including In Union of - 3 - MFA No. 203996 of 2024 1 India vs. Popular Construction Co. and State of 2 Kerala vs. V. R. Kalliyanikutty , the appeal is dismissed as time-barred, without addressing the merits. Parties shall bear their respective costs. In view of disposal of main appeal, pending applications, if any, stand rejected. The Court fee paid, if any, shall be refunded in accordance with law. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE Srt List No. : 2 Sl No. : 23 CT-AK 1 2001 (8) SCC 470 2 1999 (3) SCC 657

Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.