CHIEF MANAGER v. CHHAGANA
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: REKHA BORANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-06. CHIEF MANAGER v. CHHAGANA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:7678] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Restoration No. 78/2025 1. Chief Manager, Rsrtc Jalore, Raj. 2. Executive Director (Administration), Rsrtc Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Chhagana W/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 2. Rakesh S/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 3. Bhagwati D/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 4. Laxmi D/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 5. Pooja D/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 6. Ravina D/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 7. Moji D/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 8. Chhoti D/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 9.
Sugni W/o Poonaram, R/o Sari Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Ps Rohat, Teh. Rohat, Dist. Pali, Raj. 10. Suresh Kumar S/o Sh. Nandlal, R/o Sundar Nagar Chauhtan, Teh. Chauhtan Dist. Barmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. L. K. Purohit HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 06/02/2025 1. The present restoration application has been filed aggrieved of the order dated 06. 12. 2024 passed by Deputy Registrar [2025:RJ-JD:7678] (2 of 2) [CRES-78/2025] (Judicial) of this Court whereby the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 30. 08. 2024 passed by the Court. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that in fact, in pursuance to the order dated 30. 08. 2024, the requisite notices in the appeal were filed on 06. 09. 2024. However, there being no specific order for issuance of notice on the stay application too, the notices of the stay application were not filed. However, the office reported that the compliance of the order dated 30. 08.
2024 has not been made and consequently, the appeal was dismissed by the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court on 06. 12. 2024. 3. In view of the fact that in pursuance to the order dated 30. 08. 2024, the notices in the appeal were filed, the present restoration application is allowed. Let the appeal be restored to its original number. 4. Let notices on the stay application be filed in the appeal within a period of one week. On the same being filed, let notices of the appeal as well as the stay application be issued. (REKHA BORANA),J 220-T. Singh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.