SKOPTARLY LYNGDOH NONGLAIT v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 6 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-11-11. SKOPTARLY LYNGDOH NONGLAIT v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 6 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 21 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 197 of 2024 Date of Decision: 11. 11. 2024 Shri Skoptarly Lyngdoh Nonglait … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State of Meghalaya Represented by the Chief Secretary 2. State Project Director, SEMAN-SSA, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 3. The Director of School Education Literacy, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 4. District Mission Coordinator, SSA, South West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 5. Divisional School Education Officer, South West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 6. Block Mission Coordinator, SSA, Mawkyrwat South West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 7. The School Managing Committee of Lamlynti Lower Primary School, Pyndenumsaw, Mawkyrwat South West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 8. Smti Banshembok Wanniang, D/o Smti Sriak Wanniang, R/o Mawkyrwat Village, South West Khasi Hills, Meghalaya. … Respondent(s) _________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S.
Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. Yobin, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. I. Lyngwa, GA (For R 1-6) Mr. K. V. Kharlyngdoh, Adv. (For R 7) Ms. P. Riahtam, Adv. (For R 8) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc. : ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No ORDER 1. On the facts as they pertain today, Mr. P. Yobin, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous, in view of an order dated 17. 09. 2024 passed by respondent No. 3. 2. A copy of the order dated 17. 09. 2024 has been produced, wherein the respondents have stated that it has been established that the petitioner occupies one of the teacher position under SSA, and there is no justifiable reason for withholding of his salary. It is also stated therein that he is entitled to receive his salary along with all outstanding payments, which should be processed promptly without any further delay. 3.
In view of this development, the matter stands closed and disposed of on being infructuous. 4. Ms. P. Riahtam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 8, however still maintains that the petitioner has been irregularly appointed. Liberty is given to her to assail the same in another proceeding, if deemed necessary. 5. A copy of the order is taken on board, and made part of the record. JUDGE Meghalaya 11. 11. 2024 “V. Lyndem-PS” Signature Not Verified Page 3 of 3 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2024. 11. 26 10:28:07 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.