SURYA K.S. v. THE STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-07-30. SURYA K.S. v. THE STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A. A. TH TUESDAY, THE 30 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 26976 OF 2024 PETITIONER: SURYA K. S. AGED 29 YEARS WIFE OF SATHISH A, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER (LPST), THEVARVELIL L P SCHOOL, KOONAMKARA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689711 BY ADVS. V. A. MUHAMMED PRESAD V. G. RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014 3 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CIVIL STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689645 4 THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689672 5 THE MANAGER THEVARVELIL L P SCHOOL, KOONAMKARA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689711 OTHER PRESENT: ADV SAROJINI K G -GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30. 07.
2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 26976 OF 2024 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by the denial of approval of the th appointment, as LPST, in the School managed by the 5 respondent. According to the petitioner, the reason for not granting the approval is the dispute regarding the Management of the School. The petitioner had already submitted Ext. P3 Appeal rd before the 3 respondent, which is now pending consideration. After considering all relevant aspects, I am of the view that, the rd writ petition can be disposed of directing the 3 respondent to pass appropriate orders on Ext. P3 within a time frame. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of rd directing the 3 respondent to take up Ext. P3 appeal submitted by the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders thereon, in th accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner and the 5 respondent.
The necessary orders in this regard shall passed in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A. A. JUDGE ANK APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26976/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01. 06. 2023 TRUE COPY OF THE G. O. (P) NO. 3/2019/G. EDN. DATED 28. 02. 2019 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. J2/57/2019/G. EDN. DATED 08. 03. 2019 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B/45158/2023 DATED 15. 12. 2023 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 30. 12. 2023 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 19. 07. 2024 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 13402/ J2/12/G. EDN. DATED 10. 04. 2012 TRUE COPY OF THE G. O. (RT. ) NO. 1818/2019/ GEDN DATED 21. 05. 2019 TRUE COPY OF THE G. O. (RT. ) NO. 4503/2019/ G. EDN. DATED 29. 10. 2019 TRUE COPY OF THE G. O. (RT. ) NO. 5048/2019/ G. EDN. DATED 23. 11. 2019 TRUE COPY OF THE G. O. (RT. ) NO.
3660/2024/ GED N DATED 06. 06. 2024
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.