PEDDI ASHOK v. STATE OF TELANGANA,PRL.SCY,REVENUE,HYD,AND 6
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-11-19. PEDDI ASHOK v. STATE OF TELANGANA,PRL.SCY,REVENUE,HYD,AND 6. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
[ 31661 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) DAY OF NOVEMBER TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH FOUR TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR 2015 WRIT PETITION NO: 1l()56 oF Between: H'No 2-88' 28. vears, Occ Employee, R/o Peddi Ashok, S/o. Pentaiah, Aged itauad District. fonOapur, Hio. Konur R/m KasPet, Ad .. PETITIONER AND Rep by its Principal Secretary' Revenue Secretariat' 1. The State Of Telangana' Secretaria. Building, Hvderabad (LA' R&R)' Singareni Collieries Companv 2. The office of the Spl. 6i]iti"itot Limited. a i'nJ'6lstri. t Collector, Collectorate Buildi ng' Adi labad District' officer' Mancherial' 4. The Revenue oivisionai"cjinEiitlm-lana"ncquisition Adilabad District. Occ Business' R/o H No S/o Posham' ASq 4^O,Y93lt: 5. Gelli @ Gellu Mallesh' -uarrcneri-al' Adilabad. District r+iS"e Otd Mancheriai Rlm rimli"n. il"-.
-'il occ Asrrcurture' R/+o H No 1- 6 fir#b;;;,r;I 5i" Gift - Kasipet, Adllabad ulstrlcl 3211. Pallamguda, R/m . o"c Agriculture' R/o H No 1- Ril;;il\6Jao 7. Dussa Chandu, S/" v""it ' Aditab'ad District 5iI P;ll;grbi, Rin Kasipet, ... RESpoNDENrs the of praying that in of the Constitution lndia Petition under Article 226 be the the affidavit filed therewith' High Court may circumstances stated in the nature of Writ of or Direction more in pleased to issue a Writ or Writs, Order herein above ie the Spl Deputy Respondents 2 to 4 ' Mandamus directing the No and RDO to pay the Collector, (LA) Singareni Collieries Company Linnted compensation in respect of the Sy Nos 20' 2OlN1 and 2OtA2 to an extent of Ac. 2-35 Guntas, Ac 2-05 Guntas and Ac 2-06 Guntas respectively situat€d at Komatichenu$livar,Kasipet,AdilabadDistrictaSdetermirredbyRespondentsNo. the Respondents {he Petitioner and 2lo 4 by distributing the same equally among purchasers as per Sec 30 of family members and other No.
5 to 7 herein being the the inaction on the part of the Act, 1894' thereby declarirq Land Acquisition as of compensation denying the apportionment Respondents No. 4 in unreasonable, arbitrary and contrary to Sec. 30 of Land Acquisition . 1g94 Act, as well as in breach o'Art. 14 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia. l. A. NO: I OF 2015 WPMP. NO: 184'16 OF 2015 Petition und. r section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of releasing ol the amount of compensation in respect of Sy. Nos. 20,2OtN1 and 2OlA2 to an e)(tent of Ac. 2-35 Guntas, Ac. 2-05 Guntas and Ac. 2-06 Guntas respectrvely situate I at Komatichenu shrvar, Kasipet, Adilabad District by grantrng interrm order pendir g disposal of the main petition. Writ Counsel for the Per:itioner: SRt pOCHA|AH DORISHETTT (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Rer;pondent Nos. 1 TO 4: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Rer;pondent Nos.
5 TO 7: - The Court made tho following: ORDER l l THB HON'BLE SRI JUSTICD T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 14056 of 2015 QRDER: This matter is listed under the caption "Specially ldentified Cases (lnflructuous)" to inform as to whether the cause in the Writ Petition survives for adjudication or not. 2. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behatf of the petitioner. On the previous dates of hearing also l. e. 15-10-2024,, 05-11-2024 and l2-ll-2024, there vras no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In view of the same, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 4. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to seek revival of the Writ Petition within the period of limitation as applicable for restoration, in the event the cause in the Writ Petition survives for adjudication. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed. No costs. SD/. A.
SRINIVA SAR DOY ASSISTANT R RAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION FICER To 1 one CC to SRI POCHAIAH DORISHETTI' Advocate{OPUCI or rel€ nsana' at n eVru rii,' Hlgh io"t tot the State z Yffi &Ji;e'F' r-oC Hvderabad. {OUTI Tfto CD Copies PSK. LS $* t: HIGH COUR'I' I DATED:1911112024 t l'. t E S;'r{ ORDER ). 6 WP. No. 14056 of 2015 fl , llr[ Z0Z{ 2 ') , . , -r ri. O -,-: CLOSING THE: WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COI}TS. 2h 4ltt)
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.