MS. MAIBAM SUNITA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 7 OTHERS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-08-27. MS. MAIBAM SUNITA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 7 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Digitally signed by KABORAMBA KABORAMBAM M SANDEEP SANDEEP SINGH Date: 2024. 08. 30 SINGH 12:28:45 +05'30' Item No. 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL PIL No. 32 of 2022 Ms. Maibam Sunita; & Anr. Petitioners Vs. State of Manipur; & Ors. Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI O R D E R 27. 08. 2024 Siddharth Mridul, C. J. : Mr. Karlmarx, learned counsel, appears on behalf of the petitioners; and Mr. M. Devananda, learned Additional Advocate General, Manipur, appears on behalf of the State respondents. The present PIL under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioners, praying as follows : “In the facts and circumstances stated herein, the petitioners humbly prayed that Your Lordship be pleased to:-i) issue a Rule Nisi to the Respondents.
ii) issue a rule in the nature of MANDAMUS' and/or any other appropriate writ/direction or order thereby directing the Respondent No. 1 and 2 to file FIR against the responsible officers/ persons or handover the case to the vigilance and recover the defalcated money. iii) give direction to the respondents to execute the renovation of pond at Keirak Keithel Pukhri Makha Leikai under Kakching C. D. Block, Manipur, properly as per the measurement and quality. PIL No. 32 of 2022 Page 1 (iv) give directions to the State Government and its Departments to evolve a mechanism for proper monitoring of project and programme implementations. (v) give directions to the respondents No. 1 and 2 to initiate action against respondent No. 3 and 4 for job card frauds. (vi) pass any order or direction as to this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, for the ends of justice. ” After some arguments, Mr.
Karlmarx, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, on instructions from petitioner No. 2, who is present before this Court in person, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to initiate appropriate complaint before the jurisdictional police station, if so advised, in accordance with law, in terms of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, reported as (2008) 2 SCC 409. Leave and liberty granted. The present PIL is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Sandeep PIL No. 32 of 2022 Page 2
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.