K.Raghu Ram v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-02-13. K.Raghu Ram v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
i I [ 3302 ] I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) l FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX I j I I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 31254 0F 2025 Between: I I K Raghu Ram, s/o K. suryanarayana Rao, aged 56 years, I Assistant commissioner P,,. ol and txctse (Headquartersl Office of Commissioner of proh. and I 9] Excise, Hyderabad. I elangana state i ..... PETITIONER I I AND 'l The State of Telangana, rep by its principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Secretariat, Hyderabad. Telangana State. 2 The Commissioner of Proh and Excise, State of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The Tribunal for Disciplinary proceedings (TDp), for the state of rerangana rep by its Secretary Nampally Hydera6ad .....
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing Tribunal Enquiry case No. 497 of 2013, dated. '1-2018 5-'l is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the order passed by this Honourable court in wP No. 32300 of 2022 Dt. 22. 08. 2022 consequenfly set aside the same. LA. NO:I OF 2025 Petition Under section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ::-. ,.. di :: +ri13g :j! 5&di':g suspend the TEC No. 497120'13, Dt. 05. 11. 20'18 issued b' tre 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI R.
SATYANARAYANA MUF I - Y Counsel forthe Respondents : GP FOR SERVICES- | The Court made the following ORDER ,,:i*i . ,1-.! -kiE :;: {*ia IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 31254 OF 2025 DATE: 13. 02. 2o26 Between: I(. Raghu Ram I ... Petitioner t AND The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (trxcise) and others ... Respondents ORDER: Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner as u,ell as the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-l submits that the further proceedings against the petitioner before the Tribunal in Case No. TEC No. 497 of 2013 have been dropped and filed copy of letter dated 12. 12. 2025 to that effect and in view of the same the cause in the writ petition does not survive and requested to close the writ petition. .. . , SK,J \ 2. Recording tire aforementioned sr lrrrrission, this Writ Pctition is cLosed.
No order as to costs llliscelianeous applications pendir'1 , if an_r-, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. i (iowRl SHANK AR SD/-A. H. ri \ AR AS5 iANT REGISTR \ //TRUE COPY// c h-. - OFFICER To angana at High Court for the S t: ofTe 1. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-I' Hvderabad [OUT] e [/uRrHY' Advoc a [oPUC] , ol,:,"cc i; dir i snrvnr'TARAYANA 3 Two CD CoPies SA BS \ DnC i ) Xf. ' u-- I I HIGH COURT DATED:1310212026 &i\ lHE S < t'. i i3 // r/ti ,-. r ll I Ir8 2n2( ? = . c) 4, \6. ',. -n '\1 * r-0 ORDER WP. No. 31254 of 2025 CLOSING THE W. P WITHOUT COSTS. a JKI ' t\zl>c i I I I
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.