SMT. INDIRAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-21. SMT. INDIRAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 1449 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 1449 OF 2026 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. INDIRAMMA W/O LATE GURUBASAPPA P. B AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE GURUBASAPPA P. B. AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 3. KUM. BHARATHI D/O LATE GURUBASAPPA P. B AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT IGOORU AT POST HANGUDU HOBLI, Digitally signed DAVANGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT. by SHARADAVANI …PETITIONERS B Location: High (BY SRI. THYAGARAJA S, ADVOCATE) Court of Karnataka AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY, DR. B R AMBEDKAR ROAD M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF SCEHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY, - 2 - WP No. 1449 of 2026 NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 3.
THE DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION) DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560001 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 572 215. 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DAVANAGERE TALUK, NORTH RANGE, DAVANGERE. 6. THE SECRETARY SRI. JAYAPRAKASH NARAYANA EDUCATION SOCIETY (REG), IGOORU, DAVANGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT. 7. THE HEAD MASTER SRI. R. G. NANJAPPA HIGH SCHOOL, RAMPURA, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) TO DIRECT THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20-09-2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-D MADE BY THE 2ND PETITIONER AND THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11-07-2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-G MADE BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT AND ETC. , THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R.
KRISHNA KUMAR - 3 - WP No. 1449 of 2026 ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioners have sought for the following reliefs: “i) Issue a Writ in the nature of mandamus or any other th appropriate writ, to direct the 5 respondent to consider and dispose of the representation dated 20-09-2021 vide Annexure-D made by the 2nd petitioner and the representation dated 11-07-2023 vide Annexure-G made by st th the 1 petitioner to the 4 respondent, ii) Consequently direct the respondent No. 6 to take st necessary action on the application submitted by the 1 petitioner dated 11. 11. 2021 vide Annexure-H for providing rd compassionate appointment to the 3 petitioner and submit the proposal to the competent authorities of the respondents for approval of said appointment in terms of the circular nd issued by the 2 respondent dated 24. 07.
2023 vide Annexure-M and iii) Consequently issue a writ of directing the respondents rd consider the case of the 3 petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds in a suitable post and approve the rd appointment of the 3 petitioner with Grant-in-Aid and extend all benefits flowing thereof, or in the alternatively respondent No. 1 to 5 to take necessary courses of action to rd appoint the 3 petitioner on compassionate ground in any of the vacant post available in the State Aided Educational Institution and extend all benefits flowing thereof in the interest of justice and equity. - 4 - WP No. 1449 of 2026 iv) Grant such other reliefs as may be deems to be fit to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. ” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3. It is the grievance of the petitioners that their representations dated 20. 09. 2021 at Annexure - D and dated 11. 07.
2023 at Annexure - G submitted to the respondents has not been considered so far by them nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these circumstances, the petitioners are before this Court by way of the present petition. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is given, they would consider and pass necessary order on the said representation. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and rival submissions, the respondents are hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioners and consider their representations dated 20. 09. 2021 at Annexure - D and dated 11. 07. 2023 at Annexure - G and pass appropriate order / take appropriate - 5 - WP No. 1449 of 2026 decision in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BH List No. : 1 Sl No. : 64
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.