I.P.IBRAHIMKUTTY @ KUNHIPPA v. STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-17. I.P.IBRAHIMKUTTY @ KUNHIPPA v. STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C). No. 28120 OF 2020(L) PETITIONER/S: I. P. IBRAHIMKUTTY @ KUNHIPPA, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O ALI, ITTIKAPARAMBIL PALAKKAL(H), CHAMRAVATTOM P. O. TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. C. M. MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2 THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM P. O. , PIN-676 505. 4 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, TIRUR P. O. ,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 101. 5 THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUR TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR P. O. , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 101. 6 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, TRIPRANGODE, TRIPRANGODE P. O. ,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 108.
7 KULANGARA MEERA, D/O PADMAVATHIAMMA, KULANGARA HOUSE, CHAMRAVATTOM P. O. TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-676 102. SRI BIMAL K NATH, SR GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17. 12. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C). No. 28120 OF 2020 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner states that he is the absolute owner in title and possession of property having an extent of 25 cents of land comprised in Sy. No. 296/9 of Pallipram Amsom and Desom in Triprangode Village. he submits that he has submitted Ext. P4 representation before the 5th respondent to permit the petitioner to remit land tax in respect of the above item of property. Though various prayers are sought in this writ petition, when the matter came up for consideration, the solitary request of Sri. C. M.
Mohammed Iquabal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is for issuance of direction to the respondent to consider his representation and take a decision in an expeditious manner. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader and I have considered the submissions. 3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the assertions made by the petitioner in Exhibit P4, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 5th respondent to take up Exhibit-P4 representation and dispose it of as per procedure and in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and other affected parties, if any, expeditiously, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of WP(C). No. 28120 OF 2020 3 this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the Writ petition along with the judgment before the 5th respondent to ensure compliance. SD/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE NS WP(C). No.
28120 OF 2020 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED NO 3027/1999 OF SRO KODAKKAL DATED 17. 11. 1999 EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 23. 9. 1997. EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16. 12. 1997. EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 30. 11. 2020. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P. A. TO JUDGE
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.