USHA MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-08-21. USHA MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:34577] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1727/2024 1. Usha Meena W/o Nikhil Meena, Aged About 21 Years, D/o Shivlal Meena, R/o Veerpura Sarada, Distt. Udaipur (Raj. ). 2. Nikhil Meena S/o Ramesh Lal Meena, Aged About 22 Years, Tulso Ka Namla, Salumbar Udaipur (Raj. ) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Superintendent Of Police, Distt. Udaipur. 3. The Sho, P. s. Salumbar, Distt. Udaipur. 4. Shivlal S/o Dhula Ji, Veerpura, Jaisamand, Tehsil Sarada, Udaipur (Raj. ) 5. Ganga Bai W/o Shivlal, Veerpura, Jaisamand, Tehsil Sarada, Udaipur (Raj. ) 6. Devilal S/o Dhula Ji, Veerpura, Jaisamand, Tehsil Sarada, Udaipur (Raj. ) 7. Mukesh S/o Devilal, Veerpura, Jaisamand, Tehsil Sarada, Udaipur (Raj. ) 8. Rama Ji S/o Dhula Ji, Veerpura, Jaisamand, Tehsil Sarada, Udaipur (Raj. ) 9. Kamlesh S/o Rama Ji, Veerpura, Jaisamand, Tehsil Sarada, Udaipur (Raj. ) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gopal Singh Bhati.
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order 21/08/2024 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Perused contents of the petition along with Annexures thereof. [2024:RJ-JD:34577] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1727/2024] 3. Pleaded case is that both petitioners are major and it is their first marriage. Both are adults, wife 21 years old and husband 22 years old and, thus fully capable and legally competent to take decision to choose their respective life partners. 4. In the premise, petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 2 & 3, Superintendent Of Police, Udaipur and SHO P. S. Salumber, Udaipur, respectively, to verify or get verified the threat perception of the petitioners. If warranted, requisite steps be taken, in accordance with law for grant of protection of life and liberty to the petitioners as they apprehend threat at the hands of private respondents.
It is clarified that this order shall neither be treated as a stamp of this Court qua marriage of the petitioners nor any reflection on the merits of the contentions raised by them in the present petition. 5. Present petition stands disposed of. (ARUN MONGA),J 177-Rmathur/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.