RAJENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2026-01-09. RAJENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL th ON THE 13 OF OCTOBER, 2023 WRIT PETITION No. 16472 of 2022 BETWEEN:- 1. RAJENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI S. L. NEMA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST NOT MENTION (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. RAKESH KUMAR S/O SHRI M. L. NEMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST NOT MENTION (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. SANDEEP KUMAR S/O SHRI H. S. NEMA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST NOT MENTION (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. NILESH KUMAR S/O SHRI H. S. NEMA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST NOT MENTION (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI OM NAMDEO - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE REVENUE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH COLLECTOR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. TA H S I L D A R G O V I N D PU R A TAHSIL HUJUR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) .....
RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI VED PRAKASH TIWARI - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHWANI Signing time: 13-10-2023 19:54:01 following: ORDER Shri Ved Prakash Tiwari, Government Advocate, for State submits that records have been corrected subject to the outcome of the Second Appeal No. 2242/2023. In view of the said order dated 12. 10. 2023, passed by the Collector Bhopal, no further indulgence is required in the matter. Shri Namdeo, prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to agitate their grievance again as and when new cause of action arises. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. (VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE A. Praj. Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHWANI Signing time: 13-10-2023 19:54:01
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.