Narayanashetty Durga Saibaba v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-07. Narayanashetty Durga Saibaba v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 3444 | IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWo THOUSAND AND rwEr. riv srx PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMIN ALP ETITION NO: 104 oF 2026 Between: Narayanashetty Durqa Sarbaba... S/o. Narayanashetty Sree years occ Ramulu, Aged. Business R/o 41 H No J-tzsia6ii6s' El], i I\4edipally. 'axmr nagar Boduppal. ueacn ai Hrrafl, r1ig rr Drstrict ... pETtTtONER/ACCUSED No. 1 AND 1 The State of Telanoana Represented public prosecutor by its High Court for the State of Telangina. Hyderabad 2 Smt. Narayanashetty Swapna Rekha Wo. Narayanshetty Durga Saibaba Aged 41 years. oc6 HoJsewrfe R/o H N. -3_#t8i6/i63, sritaxmi - - - Nagar, Boduppal, Medipatty. I\rledchal tVlalkajigri Oistrtcf .. ,RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 52g of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of pelition, criminal the High court may be pleased . to quash the proceedings in c.
c No 1749 of 2oz5 on tne tt Additional Junior civil Judge-cum- Vl Additional Judicial Magistrale of First class, Medchal Malkajgiri District at L. B. Nagar against the petationer/Accused No. 1 . l. A. NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the ltilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C. C. No. 1749 of 2025 On the Il I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- Vl Additional Judicial [\Iagistrate of First Class, '1 '18 Medchal Malkajgiri District at L B. Nagar under Section 85, (1), 351 (2) BNS R/w. Sec. 3 and4 of DP Act, 1961 as against the Petitioner / Accused No,1, pending disposal of the above Crimrnal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V YADU KRISHNA SAINATH, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. '1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. \\e Cou(\$a(e \he \o\\o'r'r\nq: ORDER OF TELANGANA FOR THE STATE IN THE HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD EADA TIRUMALA DEVI SMT. JUSTICE THE HON'BLE N oI 2026 CRIMIN AL PETI TION o. 104 01 2026 DATE O F ORD ER:- 07. Between: Saibaba' NarayanashettY Durga R/o. Medchal Malkajgiri District' PetitionedAccused No. 1 AND The State of Telangana rep. by its Public Prosecutor, & another' High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad . . . Respondents ORDER '1 This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No. 1 in C. C. No.
1749 of 2A25, on the file of the learned ll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- Vl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Cass, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at L. B. Nagar, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 118(1), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry prohibition Act, 1961. 2. Heard Sri V. yadu Krishna sainath' learned counser petiti6her/accused for the No. i . ts wel/ as Sri Jitender Rao Veerarnalla, the ETD,I C. l. P. No. 1A4 _2026 learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No. 1- State 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has limited his prayer seeking a direction to dispense with the appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that appropriate orders may be passed. 5. Perused the record. C. C. No.
1749 of 2025 is pending on the file of the learned ll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- Vl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Cass, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at L. B. Nagar, Considering the submissions made by both parties and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is deemed apilropriate to dispose of the Criminal Petition by dispensing with the appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Cou(. 6. Hence, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the Trial Court provided that the petitioner is represented through an Advocate on every date of hearing and that he shall be present before the Trial court whenever his presence is specifically required during the course of trial' -. --" +l tsdDldl sardoo OC o/\^_[ I (CnaO) ateco^pv HLVN;VS VNHS1Uy 1CVA n tUS oi CO auo t (1nO) peqeraplH 1e eue6ue;a1go alels aql roj UnoC q6rpl rolncaso-rd cllqnd ol sOC o/\^l e . ls!
c uu'alerauorssruru]oJ epuolieqceu 'auo7 ur6[e11ey1 'uorsrnr6 urbteyleyl'1edd1 g6n1 'racr]Jo asnoH uorle]S aql Z rebeg g'-1 je tcujsrC ur6[e11ey1 leqcpayysselC ls]rJ 1o a1er1sr6ey1 g4 -unc-a6pn1 rorunl ler3rpnl leuolyppv lr^r3 leuorlrppv aqt ll L 'ol us3tJlo Notl-cfs //Adoc lnul// UVUISIC]U INVlSISSV 'S . /OS OVU VNNIUVYIIIVI^J pasolc puels 'Iue lt 'ourpuod suotltlad snoouellacstr\ lleqs L I,OJ. ) t HIGH COURT DATED:0710112026 o C) 13FE0ffi ORDER * CRLP. No. 1O4 of 2026 I CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF q ". e k"
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.