REHMAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Court: High Court of Uttarakhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Uttarakhand judgment dated 2024-12-30. REHMAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1307 of 2024 Rehman ... Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …. Respondent Present:- Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant Rehman seeks anticipatory bail in FIR/Case Crime No. 110 of 2024 under Section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Buggawala, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that nothing was recovered from the applicant; it is a false case. 4. Learned State Counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed as such and the anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. He would submit that apprehending his arrest, the applicant managed to escape from the spot.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that case, in which the applicant should be granted bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate with the investigation. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned. (iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO.
(v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J. ) 30. 12. 2024 Avneet/
Source: High Court of Uttarakhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.