MANSAROVER PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. v. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD- 16(1)
Court: High Court of Delhi
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Delhi judgment dated 2020-11-09. MANSAROVER PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. v. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD- 16(1). Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W. P. (C) 8824/2020 MANSAROVER PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Chand, Advocate versus ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD-16(1) ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Aggarwal, Advocate. th % Date of Decision: 09 November, 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J (Oral): 1. The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking refund of Rs 2,96,610/-along with interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent has grossly erred in law in not granting refund for the Assessment Year 2008-09 as determined under Section 143(1)(e) of the Act and that too without giving any reasons. 4.
He further states that the respondent has granted credit for TDS Certificate of Rs. 10,54,740/- instead of Rs. 12,66,069/- claimed in the return of income. He emphasises that the petitioner had requested the respondent th th for grant of refund vide letters dated 14 February, 2011, 29 October, th th 2012, 29 September, 2020 and 29 October, 2020. 5. Issue notice. 6. Mr. Sunil Aggarwal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 7. Keeping in view the limited prayer, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide and dispose of the th th petitioner’s letters/applications dated 14 February, 2011, 29 October, th th 2012, 29 September, 2020 and 29 October, 2020, in accordance with law, by way of a reasoned order within twelve weeks after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. 8. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.
Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail. MANMOHAN, J SANJEEV NARULA, J NOVEMBER 09, 2020 js
Source: High Court of Delhi. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.