SANGEETA RATHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-16. SANGEETA RATHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13389/2020 Sangeeta Rathore D/o Jai Singh Rathore, Aged About 54 Years, Nasrani Cinema Ke Piche, Sardarpura 1St A Road, Jodhpur, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan. 4. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary Education, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan. 5. The Chief Block Education Officer, Block Rohat, District Pali, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Jangid through Cisco Webex App JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Judgment 16/12/2020 1.
The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to give joining to the petitioner pursuant to his merit as per merit list of teacher Gr. III. 2. After the order of posting, the petitioner made representation for being posted at School where the post was still vacant. However, the respondents did not pass any order on the said representation. (2 of 2) [CW-13389/2020] 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh detailed representation and the respondents may be directed to decide the said representation expeditiously. 4.
In view of the submissions made, the petitioner may approach the respondents with appropriate representation mentioning all the facts and raising his grievances and it is expected from the respondents to decide the representation most expeditiously preferably within a period of three weeks from the date the representation is made along with copy of this order. 5. In case the petitioner has any grievance qua disposal of the representation, he would be free to take appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. 6. The writ petition so also the stay application stands disposed of accordingly. (DINESH MEHTA),J 101-Ramesh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.