Raj Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2026-02-10. Raj Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 88303 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -719 Year-2024 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Raj Kumar Sah S/O Late Asharafi Lal Sah R/O Mohalla- D. N. High School, Sabji Bagh, Daldali Bazar, P. S. - Town, Dist. - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1 . The State of Bihar 2. Nirpendra Kumar Rai S/O Not Known Manager of M/s Shri Sai Organic Foods pvt. ltd. , Situated at 1st floor, Maa hero service station building, Kamalnath Nagar, P. S. - Bettiah, Dist. - West Champaran- 845438 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.
JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State . 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 336(4), 356(2), 356(4), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3 . As per F. I. R. , this petitioner is involved in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 88303 of 2025(2) dt. 10-02-2026 2/3 business of selling duplicate rice under the White Tiger trademark. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence . The name of the petitioner’s proprietorship firm is named in the F. i. R. as M/S Hanuman Galla Bhandar. During course of investigation , the entire premises of the petitioner was inspected and no materials has come with regard to ‘alleged infringing trademark, copyright and misusing duplication of the product of informant’s company . Only suspicion has been raised against this petitioner.
Save and except, suspicion , there is no other material on record to substantiate the allegation against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5 . Learned A. P. P. for the State opposed the bail application . 6. Considering the backdrop of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate , Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 88303 of 2025(2) dt. 10-02-2026 3/3 Muzaffarpur in connection with Town P. S. Case No. 719 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.