Skip to main content
LawSphereX

H. E. GURURAJ v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Court: High Court of Karnataka

Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-22. H. E. GURURAJ v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

- 1 - WP No. 18481 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ND DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 18481 OF 2023 (S-TR) BETWEEN: H. E. GURURAJ SON OF LATE ESHWARACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD, SUB DIVISION, MANDYA, BANDIGOWDA LAYOUT, MANDYA-571 401. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJAPPA A. , ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, Digitally AMBEDKAR VEEDI, signed by BANGALORE-560 001. CHANDANA B M 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR Location: KARNATAKA WATER SUPPLY High Court of Karnataka AND DRAINAGE BOARD, NO. 5 AND 6, JALA BHAVANA, BTM LAYOUT, ST ST 1 STAGE, 1 PHASE, BANERGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 029. 3. BABU SAHEB Y NADAF SON OF NADAF, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NOW WORKING AS TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, KARNATAKA WATER SUPPLY - 2 - WP No.

18481 of 2023 AND DRAINAGE BOARD, BELLARY DIVISION, BELLARY-583 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G. RAMESH NAIK, AGA FOR R-1; SMT. M. R. SINCHANA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & SRI. A. C. BALARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W. P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DTD 16. 08. 2023 IN NO. AAHE30 UWE 2023(E) ISSUED BY THE R1 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-E AND THE OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM LETTER DTD 19. 08. 2023 IN NO. KAJAMA/HRD-1/668/2023-24 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-E1 ISSUED BY THE R2 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SV List No. : 2 Sl No. : 104

Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.