NANDLAL YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2025-12-22. NANDLAL YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7452 of 2025 ---- Nandlal Yadav, aged about 32 years, son of Late Gopal Yadav, resident of village – Indarwa, PO – Indrwa, PS and District – Koderma .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, Advocate ---- 02/22. 12. 2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1925 of 2023, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 26(1)(g) of Indian Forest Act (Bihar Amendment Act, 1989) and Sections 27, 29 and 51 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 and pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. 3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegation is made against the petitioner of doing an illegal mining of blue stones. He further submits that the petitioner is a labourer and even the name of the person, who has taken the name of the petitioner, has not been disclosed in the offence report. He then submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No. 13 of the petition. --1-- A. B. A. No. 7452 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner of illegally doing the mining work. 5. Considering that the petitioner is said to be labourer and by way of doing the said work he earns his livelihood and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No. 13 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.
Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Complaint Case No. 1925 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) Dated 22. 12. 2025 Sangam/ --2-- A. B. A. No. 7452 of 2025
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.