K.D.RAPPAI v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-01-15. K.D.RAPPAI v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TH MONDAY, THE 15 DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 25TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 37999 OF 2015 PETITIONER: K. D. RAPPAI AGED 50 YEARS S/O. DEVASSY, KONNIKKARA HOUSE, COMPANY PADI, OLLUR- 680 306, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI. K. I. SAGEER RESPONDENTS: 1 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE THRISSUR CITY, THRISSUR, PIN-682001. 2 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE THRISSUR, PIN-682001. 3 CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE OLLUR, PIN-682006. OTHER PRESENT: SMT. RESHMI THOMAS (GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15. 01. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W. P. (C)No. 37999/2015 2 JUDGMENT This writ petition was filed in the year 2015 alleging inaction on the part of the Police authorities in redressing a complaint raised by the petitioner against certain officials of the Thrissur Corporation.
The reliefs sought for in the writ petition are the following:-a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, st order or direction directing the 1 respondent to take action on Ext. P1 immediately within the time limit fixed by this Hon'ble Court. b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, st order or direction directing the 1 respondent to seek explanation from the respondents No. 2 and 3 for delaying action on Ext. P1 and initiate action against them. c) Issue such other appropriate writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. ” When this matter came up on 15. 12. 2015, this Court passed the following order:- “Petitioner has not impleaed the necessary parties. Post when moved again. ” The petitioner has not taken steps to implead the necessary parties on the basis of the order issued by this Court on 15. 12. 2015.
That apart, by passage of time, the reliefs sought for in the writ petition appear to W. P. (C)No. 37999/2015 3 have become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE acd W. P. (C)No. 37999/2015 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37999/2015 PETITIONER EXHIBITS P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE CHIEF MINISTERS GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL CELL DT 23- 5-2015. P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE CHIEF MINISTERS GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL CELL TO THE PETITIONER DT 30-6- 2016. P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER RTI ACT TO THE PETITIONER DT 16-10-2015. P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER RTI ACT DT 20- 10-2015
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.