SMT SHALU v. STATE
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-03. SMT SHALU v. STATE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 2970/2020 Smt Shalu W/o Ashish Singhla D/o Sundarlal Goyal, Aged About 28 Years, At Present R/o Ward No. 15, Jaitsar, District Sriganganagar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State, Through P. p. 2. Superintendent Of Police CID (CB), Jaipur. 3. Deputy Superintendent Of Police Cid (CB), Bikaner. 4. Ashish Singhal S/o Shri Mahesh Kumar, resident of Mehtab Colony, New Ghadsana, Nai Mandi Ghadsana, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 5. Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Late Deshraj, resident of Mehtab Colony, New Ghadsana, Nai Mandi Ghadsana, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 6. Smt. Suman W/o Shri Mahesh Kumar, resident of Mehtab Colony, New Ghadsana, Nai Mandi Ghadsana, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 7. Preeti D/o Shri Mahesh Kumar, resident of Mehtab Colony, New Ghadsana, Nai Mandi Ghadsana, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 8. Neeru W/o Shri Kamal Garg, resident of Model Town Bhatinda, Bhatinda, Punjab. 9.
Bhushan Goyal, S/o not known, resident of Sangat Mandi, Bhatinda, Punjab. 10. Guddu @ Rekha W/o Shri Bhushan Goyal, resident of Sangat Mandi, Bhatinda, Punjab. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur, through video-call. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudhir Tak, P. P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Judgment / Order 03/12/2020 The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. has been filed by the petitioner-complainants with the limited prayer that the Investigating Agency may be directed to conduct fair and (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2970/2020] impartial investigation in FIR No. 301/2018, Police Station Jaitsar, Sriganganagar. Learned Public Prosecutor states that the Investigating agency is already conducting free and fair investigation, however, if any material is brought on record by the petitioner the same shall be considered by the prosecution strictly in accordance with law before completing the investigation.
In light of the aforesaid assurance of the Public Prosecutor, the present criminal misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit the representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police, who shall decide his representation strictly in accordance with law. The instant misc. petition is disposed of accordingly. Stay petition is also disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 44-/-Prashant
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.